Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
Simultaneous Multislice-Based 5-Minute Lumbar Spine MRI Protocol: Initial Experience in a Clinical Setting
Maria G Longo1, Joana Fagundes2, Susie Huang1
1Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Background And Purpose:
Previous studies have used parallel imaging (PI) techniques to decrease spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol acquisition times. Recently developed MRI sequences allow even faster acquisitions. Our purpose was to develop a lumbar spine MRI protocol using PI with GRAPPA (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition) and a simultaneous multislice (SMS)-based sequence and to evaluate its diagnostic performance compared to a standard lumbar spine MRI protocol.
Methods:
Ten patients were scanned in a 3-Tesla scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare). Each patient was imaged using a standard protocol and an optimized fast protocol acquiring the same contrasts and planes. The fast protocol included sagittal T1, T2, and fat suppressed T2 sequences accelerated with GRAPPA and an SMS-based axial T2-weighted sequence using a high-density spine coil (Siemens MR, 30 channel spine). Two blinded neuroradiologists independently assessed image quality and diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant imaging findings.
Results:
The fast protocol acquisition time was 5:28 minutes, compared with 16:30 minutes for the standard protocol. Both protocols had a similar performance for definition of anatomical structures, diagnostic quality, and identification of clinically relevant imaging findings. There were more artifacts in the SMS Turbo Spin Echo (P = .014) sequence without compromising diagnostic performance. Artifacts in the remaining non-SMS sequences were similar in both protocols (P > .180). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 5-minute protocol were 92.3%, 100.0%, and 99.6%, respectively, for the clinically relevant findings (P = 1.0, interrater agreement .57).
Conclusions:
A 5-minute SMS-based MRI protocol for lumbar spine imaging is feasible and can be achieved without significant impact in the overall diagnostic quality.
Insights
A new 5-minute lumbar spine MRI protocol using simultaneous multislice (SMS) and generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) significantly reduces scan time. This fast MRI protocol maintains diagnostic quality and accuracy comparable to standard imaging.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging Technology
- Neurology
Background:
- Parallel imaging (PI) techniques have been used to shorten spine MRI acquisition times.
- Advanced MRI sequences now enable even faster imaging protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a rapid lumbar spine MRI protocol using PI with GRAPPA and a simultaneous multislice (SMS)-based sequence.
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of this fast protocol against a standard lumbar spine MRI protocol.
Main Methods:
- Ten patients underwent lumbar spine MRI on a 3-Tesla scanner using both a standard and an optimized fast protocol.
- The fast protocol incorporated GRAPPA acceleration and an SMS-based axial T2-weighted sequence.
- Two neuroradiologists assessed image quality and diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant findings.
Main Results:
- The fast protocol reduced acquisition time from 16:30 minutes to 5:28 minutes.
- Diagnostic quality and accuracy were comparable between the fast and standard protocols.
- While SMS Turbo Spin Echo sequences showed more artifacts, overall diagnostic performance was not compromised.
Conclusions:
- A 5-minute simultaneous multislice (SMS)-based MRI protocol for lumbar spine imaging is feasible.
- This accelerated protocol can be implemented without significantly impacting diagnostic quality.

