Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

07:43
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
2.8K
Development of between-trial response strategy adjustments in a continuous action control task: A cross-sectional
Frederick Verbruggen1, Rossy McLaren2
1School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|June 5, 2017
Summary
Children and young adults adjust response strategies trial-by-trial in dynamic tasks. While age impacts overall speed, the ability to adapt strategies matures rapidly, showing similar adjustments across age groups.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Executive control is crucial for adapting response strategies in changing environments.
- Continuous action control tasks require dynamic adjustments to stimuli and goals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how children and young adults adjust response strategies in a continuous action control task.
- To examine the influence of previous trial properties on current performance and strategy adjustments.
- To compare age-related differences in performance and strategy adjustment mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Participants (4-11 years) and young adults (18-21 years) performed a continuous action control task with occasional target location changes.
- Performance was analyzed based on trial-by-trial effects, specifically examining 'change' and 'no-change' trials.
- The impact of previous trial stimuli and change signals on current performance was assessed.
Main Results:
- Performance on 'no-change' trials was impaired, while performance on 'change' trials was improved following a previous 'change signal' trial.
- These between-trial effects on 'no-change' trials were independent of previous stimulus repetition.
- Significant age-related differences were found in overall response latencies, but not in the magnitude of response strategy adjustments.
Conclusions:
- Findings support the hypothesis of trial-by-trial adjustments in response strategies.
- Response strategy adjustment mechanisms appear to mature earlier than other executive action control mechanisms.
- This suggests a distinct developmental trajectory for adaptive strategy modulation compared to general executive functions.

