Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Abdominal Tumors
Published on: March 7, 2011
Decision Making: Thermal Ablation Options for Small Renal Masses
Colin J McCarthy1, Debra A Gervais1
1Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract:
Renal cell carcinoma is a relatively common tumor, with an estimated 63,000 new cases being diagnosed in the United States in 2016. Surgery, be it with partial or total nephrectomy, is considered the mainstay of treatment for many patients. However, those patients with small renal masses, typically less than 3 to 4 cm in size who are deemed unsuitable for surgery, may be suitable for percutaneous thermal ablation. We review the various treatment modalities, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation; discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method; and review the latest data concerning the performance of the various ablative modalities compared with each other, and compared with surgery.
Insights
Percutaneous thermal ablation offers a viable treatment for small renal masses in patients unsuitable for surgery. This review compares radiofrequency, microwave, and cryoablation effectiveness against each other and surgery.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common cancer, with surgery as the primary treatment.
- Small renal masses (<3-4 cm) unsuitable for surgery present a treatment challenge.
- Percutaneous thermal ablation is an alternative for select patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review percutaneous thermal ablation modalities for small renal masses.
- To compare radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation.
- To evaluate ablative techniques against each other and surgical options.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on percutaneous thermal ablation for renal masses.
- Analysis of treatment modalities: radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation.
- Comparison of efficacy and outcomes data for each modality and surgery.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous thermal ablation is effective for small renal masses in non-surgical candidates.
- Each ablation modality has distinct advantages and disadvantages.
- Comparative data suggests varying performance metrics between modalities and surgery.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous thermal ablation is a valuable option for select patients with small renal masses.
- The choice of ablation modality depends on tumor characteristics and patient factors.
- Further comparative studies are needed to optimize treatment strategies.
More Related Videos
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
Published on: January 9, 2019
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018