Participation and community-based walking activity after neuroprosthesis use in children with hemiplegic cerebral

Amy F Bailes1,2, Cailee Caldwell1, Mike Clay1

  • 1Division of Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Insights

Daily use of neuroprosthesis improved participation and reduced trips in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP). Community walking activity did not significantly change, but satisfaction with the device was high.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Pediatric Orthopedics

Background:

  • Hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) often impacts community ambulation and participation.
  • Neuroprosthetic devices offer a potential avenue to enhance motor function and independence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of neuroprosthesis use on participation, community walking activity, safety, and satisfaction in children with hemiplegic CP.
  • To assess changes in self-selected participation goals and walking activity levels.

Main Methods:

  • A 16-week intervention study involving eleven children (mean age 9y 11mo) with hemiplegic CP (GMFCS Levels I-II).
  • Utilized the Ness L300 neuroprosthesis, measuring outcomes with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Step Watch Activity Monitor (SAM), and caregiver-reported trip/fall frequency.
  • Assessed satisfaction through a dedicated questionnaire.

Main Results:

  • Significant improvements (p<0.001) in performance and satisfaction with participation goals (COPM).
  • A significant reduction (p=0.01) in reported trips from baseline to post-intervention.
  • High levels of satisfaction reported with the neuroprosthesis device.

Conclusions:

  • Daily neuroprosthesis use may enhance participation goal achievement and reduce tripping incidents in children with hemiplegic CP.
  • No significant changes were observed in community-based walking activity levels.
  • Further research is recommended to explore responses based on GMFCS levels, geographical variations, and comparisons with functional electrical stimulation (FES) neuroprostheses and control groups.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos