Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

305
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
305
Attribution01:26

Attribution

345
In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
345
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

683
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
683
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The synthesis and the two scenarios.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2021
Same author

The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part II: The Synthesis and Since.

Journal of the history of biology·2019
Same author

Outcomes of European Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills (EBLUS) Examinations: Results from European School of Urology (ESU) and EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) over 6 Years (2013-2018).

European urology focus·2019
Same author

Nucleation of Graphene Layers on Magnetic Oxides: Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>(111) and Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(0001) from Theory and Experiment.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2016
Same author

The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part I: Darwin, Darwinism, and the Mutationists.

Journal of the history of biology·2016
Same author

What are narratives good for?

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences·2016
Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason&#180;s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K

Narrative possibility and narrative explanation.

John Beatty1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|June 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Narrative explanations explore unrealized possibilities, focusing on what might have happened. This research defines narrative explanation as a counterfactual, difference-making approach grounded in historical or narrative possibility.

Keywords:
Branching timeContingencyCounterfactual explanationDisnarrationHistorical or narrative counterfactualsHistorical or narrative possibilityNarrative explanationSideshadowingVirtual narratives

More Related Videos

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason&#180;s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Narrative Theory
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Narratives encompass both actual events and potential alternatives.
  • Unrealized possibilities are crucial for understanding narrative explanations.
  • Existing explanations often overlook the role of narrative possibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and analyze narrative explanation as a distinct form of counterfactual reasoning.
  • To establish the criteria for valid counterfactual conditions within narrative explanations.
  • To explore the application of narrative explanation across literary, historical, and scientific domains.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of narrative explanation.
  • Examination of counterfactual reasoning in different contexts.
  • Comparative study of literary, historical, and scientific narratives.

Main Results:

  • Narrative explanation is characterized as a difference-making, counterfactual approach.
  • A key qualification is that counterfactual conditions must be historically or narratively possible.
  • This framework is applicable to diverse forms of narrative.

Conclusions:

  • Narrative explanations productively utilize unrealized possibilities.
  • The historical or narrative possibility of counterfactuals is a demanding but essential criterion.
  • The study provides a framework for understanding explanation in various narrative forms.