Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Young Children's Moral Judgments, Justifications, and Emotion Attributions in Peer Relationship Contexts
Judith G Smetana1, Courtney L Ball1
1University of Rochester.
Abstract:
Children (n = 160, 4- to 9-year-olds; Mage = 6.23 years, SD = 1.46) judged, justified, attributed emotions, and rated intent for hypothetical physical harm, psychological harm, and resource distribution transgressions against close friends, acquaintances, disliked peers, or bullies. Transgressions against bullies were judged more acceptable than against friends and disliked peers and less deserving of punishment than against acquaintances and disliked peers. Transgressions against friends were judged least intended and resulting in more negative emotions for transgressors; actors transgressing against disliked peers, as compared to bullies or acquaintances, were happy victimizers. Across relationships, children viewed moral transgressions as wrong independent of rules and authority, based primarily on welfare and fairness justifications. Peer context colors but does not fundamentally change moral evaluations.
More Related Videos
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
08:09Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings