Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay
Peter W Akers1, Nam Cao Hoai Le2, Andrew R J Nelson3
1School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand and MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.
Biointerphases
|June 8, 2017
Summary
Surface modifications of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) impact fluorescence immunoassays. Dendrimer coatings, specifically G3.5, optimize antibody presentation for enhanced specific binding and reduced non-specific signals.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Surface Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) is a common surface for immunoassays.
- Antibody immobilization on surfaces can lead to clustering and reduced assay performance.
- Optimizing antibody presentation is crucial for sensitive and specific immunoassays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate surface engineering strategies for PMMA to improve fluorescence immunoassay performance.
- To understand how different surface chemistries affect antibody orientation, loading, and binding.
- To identify surface modifications that minimize antibody clustering and self-quenching.
Main Methods:
- Surface modification of PMMA using ultraviolet-ozone oxidation, poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG4) chains, and carboxylic acid-terminated dendrimers (G1.5 to G5.5).
- Chemical coupling of anti-human IgG antibodies via amide formation.
- Characterization using fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) and neutron reflectometry (NR).
- Evaluation of antibody surface loading, antigen binding capacity, and nonspecific binding.
Main Results:
- Physical adsorption on PMMA resulted in multilayers with low antigen binding.
- Carboxylated surfaces formed monolayers with chemical coupling.
- Antibody clustering and self-quenching were observed on unmodified and some modified surfaces.
- PEG4 surfaces showed high conformational flexibility.
- Dendrimer-modified surfaces exhibited collapse and densification.
- The G3.5 dendrimer surface provided the optimal balance of high specific and low nonspecific signals in FIA.
Conclusions:
- Surface chemistry significantly influences antibody behavior and immunoassay results.
- Dendrimer surface modification, particularly G3.5, effectively controls antibody presentation.
- Optimized antibody orientation and reduced clustering on G3.5 dendrimers enhance immunoassay specificity and sensitivity.


