Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Multimodality Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia
Published on: July 21, 2023
Direct peritoneal resuscitation improves mesenteric perfusion by nitric oxide dependent pathways
Sina Khaneki1, Amanda R Jensen1, Natalie A Drucker1
1Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children and Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Background:
Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been shown to increase survival after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/R). We have previously appreciated that minimum essential medium (MEM), a synthetic cell culture medium with bovine serum, glutamine, and antibiotics, contributes to these benefits. We hypothesized that (1) DPR using MEM as a dialysate would increase mesenteric perfusion, improve intestinal mucosal injury, and limit intestinal and hepatic inflammation after intestinal I/R and (2) these improvements would be dependent on endothelial nitric oxide pathways.
Methods:
Eight-week-old C57Bl6J wild-type (WT) and eNOS Knock Out (eNOS KO) male mice were anesthetized and intestinal ischemia was induced for 60 min. After ischemia, 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline vehicle or MEM was injected into the abdominal cavity. Intestinal perfusion was reassessed after 48 h. Animals were then euthanized, and intestines and livers explanted for histologic and molecular analyses.
Results:
DPR with MEM significantly improved mesenteric perfusion compared with vehicle (phosphate buffered saline) as measured by Laser Doppler Imaging (WT + MEM 91.58 ± 13.74%, WT + Vehicle 44.27 ± 11.93%, P < 0.05); however, these benefits were lost when endothelial nitric oxide signaling pathways were ablated (eNOS KO + MEM 21.72 ± 5.67 %, eNOS KO + Vehicle 45.24± 11.31%). WT mice treated with MEM also had significantly better preservation of their mucosal architecture (WT + MEM Mdn = 1.0, interquartile range [IQR] = 1.25, WT + Vehicle Mdn = 3.0, IQR = 2.0, P < 0.05). When we compared eNOS KO mice treated with either MEM or vehicle the protective effect of MEM disappeared (eNOS KO + MEM Mdn = 2.0, IQR = 2.25, eNOS KO + Vehicle Mdn = 2.0, IQR = 1.0 P > 0.05). Intestinal levels of interleukin (IL)-1β were increased in WT animals treated with MEM compared with eNOS KOs, whereas concentrations of intestinal IL-6 were similar between groups. Hepatic levels of both IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly elevated in eNOS KOs compared with WT treated with MEM.
Conclusions:
DPR with MEM has significant therapeutic potential for improving mesenteric perfusion, intestinal injury, and the local inflammatory response after intestinal I/R. These benefits appear to be dependent on nitric oxide signaling within the endothelium.
Insights
Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) using minimum essential medium (MEM) enhances survival after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) by improving mesenteric perfusion and reducing injury. These benefits depend on endothelial nitric oxide pathways.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Research
- Gastroenterology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) improves survival in intestinal ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury.
- Minimum essential medium (MEM) is a key component in DPR, showing therapeutic benefits.
- The role of endothelial nitric oxide pathways in MEM-mediated DPR is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of MEM-based DPR on mesenteric perfusion, intestinal injury, and inflammation following I/R.
- To determine if the benefits of MEM-based DPR are dependent on endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathways.
Main Methods:
- Wild-type (WT) and eNOS knockout (eNOS KO) mice underwent induced intestinal ischemia for 60 minutes.
- Following ischemia, 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle) or MEM was administered intraperitoneally.
- Mesenteric perfusion, intestinal mucosal injury, and hepatic/intestinal inflammation were assessed after 48 hours.
Main Results:
- MEM-based DPR significantly improved mesenteric perfusion in WT mice compared to vehicle (91.58% vs. 44.27%, P < 0.05).
- This perfusion benefit was lost in eNOS KO mice, indicating dependence on nitric oxide signaling.
- MEM treatment preserved mucosal architecture in WT mice, an effect absent in eNOS KO mice. Hepatic inflammation was elevated in eNOS KOs.
Conclusions:
- DPR with MEM demonstrates significant therapeutic potential for intestinal I/R injury.
- The protective effects of MEM-based DPR are critically dependent on endothelial nitric oxide signaling.
- Further research into eNOS-dependent mechanisms could optimize DPR strategies for I/R injury.
More Related Videos
07:05Visualization of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Mesenteric Venules After Mesenteric Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Intravital Microscopy
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Spectral Characterization of Physiological and Malperfused Tissues
Published on: July 5, 2024