The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Spindle Assembly
The Mitotic Spindle
Forces Acting on Chromosomes
Meiosis II
Meiosis vs. Mitosis
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Manipulation and Analysis of Cell Cycle-Dependent Processes in Budding Yeast
Published on: September 26, 2025
Emily S Tubman1, Sue Biggins2, David J Odde1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
This study uses a mathematical model to explore how cells correct errors during mitosis in budding yeast. The model shows that a delay before detachment allows correct attachments to stabilize. The delay is caused by multiple phosphorylation events under low tension. The model also explains how microtubule depolymerization generates tension in correct attachments. These findings provide a framework for understanding how cells avoid errors in chromosome segregation. The model aligns with experimental data on yeast mitotic spindles. The study highlights the importance of phosphorylation thresholds and microtubule dynamics in error correction. The results could inform future research on mitotic fidelity.
Area of Science:
Background:
Mitotic fidelity depends on accurate kinetochore-microtubule attachments. While tension stabilizes correct bioriented attachments, syntelic attachments lack tension and must be corrected. Phosphorylation destabilizes low-tension attachments but introduces a delay problem. Prior work identified the initiation problem of biorientation (IPBO) as a key unresolved issue. No existing framework explains how the delay before detachment solves the IPBO. This gap motivated the development of a stochastic model to explore error correction in budding yeast mitosis. The model aims to clarify how phosphorylation events and microtubule dynamics contribute to attachment stability. Understanding these mechanisms could improve models of mitotic error correction. The study builds on prior findings about kinetochore phosphorylation and microtubule tension. It addresses a specific gap in the mechanistic understanding of attachment correction.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study seeks to resolve the IPBO by modeling how kinetochore-microtubule attachments correct errors during mitosis. The focus is on the delay before detachment that allows bioriented attachments to stabilize. The researchers aim to determine if phosphorylation events and microtubule depolymerization can mechanistically explain this delay. The study addresses a specific problem in mitotic fidelity: how cells avoid syntelic attachments. The motivation comes from the lack of a mechanistic framework for the observed delay. The model tests whether requiring multiple phosphorylation events under low tension can solve the IPBO. The study also investigates how microtubule depolymerization contributes to tension generation. These questions aim to clarify the molecular logic of attachment correction.
Main Methods:
The researchers developed a stochastic mathematical model to simulate kinetochore-microtubule interactions. The model incorporates phosphorylation events and microtubule dynamics to simulate attachment stability. The model uses probabilistic rules to represent the likelihood of detachment under different tension conditions. The approach integrates known biochemical properties of kinetochore proteins and microtubules. The model simulates the effects of varying phosphorylation thresholds on attachment lifetimes. The researchers tested different scenarios to determine which parameters best replicate experimental observations. The model was validated against published data on wild-type spindles. The simulations aimed to identify the minimal requirements for solving the IPBO.
Main Results:
The model shows that a large number of phosphorylation events under low tension causes a necessary delay before detachment. This delay allows bioriented attachments to stabilize before syntelic ones are lost. The model also demonstrates that kinetochore-induced microtubule depolymerization generates tension in amphitelic attachments. Syntelic attachments lack this tension-generating mechanism. The simulations replicate the high degree of amphitely observed in wild-type spindles. The model predicts that multiple phosphorylation sites are required for detachment under low tension. The results suggest that phosphorylation thresholds are critical for attachment correction. The findings align with experimental data on yeast mitotic spindles.
Conclusions:
The model provides a mechanistic framework for the delay before detachment that solves the IPBO. The findings suggest that multiple phosphorylation events under low tension are necessary for error correction. The model also shows that microtubule depolymerization generates tension in bioriented attachments. These results support the authors' claim that the delay mechanism is essential for mitotic fidelity. The model explains how phosphorylation thresholds and microtubule dynamics contribute to attachment stability. The conclusions are based on the model's ability to replicate experimental observations. The authors propose that this framework could inform future studies on mitotic error correction. The study highlights the importance of stochastic modeling in understanding complex biological processes.
The model suggests that multiple phosphorylation events under low tension create a necessary delay before detachment.
The model shows that kinetochore-induced microtubule depolymerization generates tension in amphitelic attachments.
A large number of phosphorylation events under low tension is required to delay detachment and allow bioriented attachments to stabilize.
Microtubule depolymerization generates tension in amphitelic, but not syntelic, attachments according to the model.
The model's predictions align with experimental observations of high amphitely in wild-type spindles.
The model provides a mechanistic framework for the delay before detachment that solves the IPBO.