Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children
Published on: September 1, 2018
Learning and Timing of Voluntary Blink Responses Match Eyeblink Conditioning
Anders Rasmussen1,2, Dan-Anders Jirenhed3
1Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC F10, 22184, Lund, Sweden. anders.rasmussen@med.lu.se.
Abstract:
Can humans produce well-timed blink responses to a neutral stimulus voluntarily, without receiving any blink-eliciting, unconditional, stimulus? And if they can, to what degree does classical eyeblink conditioning depend on volition? Here we show that voluntary blink responses learned in two paradigms that did not involve any unconditional blink-eliciting stimuli, display timing that is as good, or better than, the timing of blink responses learned in a standard eyeblink conditioning paradigm. The exceptional timing accuracy likely stems from the fact that, in contrast to previous studies, we challenged our participants to blink in a timed manner, and not merely to blink so as to avoid the corneal air puff. These results reveal a remarkable level of voluntary control over a simple movement, and they challenge the view that learning during eyeblink conditioning is necessarily automatic and involuntary.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...

