Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Deep learning-derived left ventricular circumferential strain for cardiac MRI diagnosis of acute myocarditis with
Xinping Zhang1, Ce Wang1, Caixue Cheng1
1Department of Radiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Abstract:
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning-derived left ventricular circumferential strain (DL-LVCS), a method that reduces operator dependency and analysis time compared with conventional feature tracking, in patients with acute myocarditis and preserved LVEF (≥ 55%), and to compare it with feature tracking-derived strain (FT-LVCS). This retrospective study, conducted between January 2021 and December 2024, included 142 patients with acute myocarditis, stratified into preserved EF (AMY-pEF, n = 106, mean age, 31 ± 9 years; 80 male) and reduced EF (n = 36, mean age, 33 ± 12 years; 27 male) groups, alongside 106 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age, 32 ± 7 years; 78 male). A deep learning model integrating PPIM-Net (Pyramid Progressive Image Mapping Network) for segmentation and U-Net for motion tracking was developed to compute DL-LVCS. Conventional LVCS was also obtained. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC analysis, and AUCs were compared with the DeLong test. In the AMY-pEF group, both FT-LVCS (-18.4%±1.2 vs. -19.8% ±1.3) and DL-LVCS (-8.0%±1.4 vs. -10.4%±1.8) were significantly impaired versus controls (both P < 0.001). For diagnosing AMY-pEF, FT-LVCS (cutoff=-19.3%) achieved an AUC of 0.806, with 67.2% sensitivity and 84.5% specificity. DL-LVCS (cutoff=-9.2%) demonstrated significantly higher AUC (0.887), sensitivity (85.9%), and specificity (79.2%) (DeLong P < 0.01). DL-LVCS enables quantification of myocardial deformation and demonstrates higher sensitivity than conventional LVCS for discriminating patients with CMR-defined acute myocarditis and preserved LVEF from healthy controls. It may serve as a supplementary CMR biomarker when standard functional metrics are within normal ranges.
