Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
To Screen or Not to Screen? Examining the Arguments Against Screening for Atrial Fibrillation
Lis Neubeck1, Jessica Orchard2, Nicole Lowres3
1School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Sydney Nursing School, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening is recommended but faces arguments against it. This study evaluates AF screening against World Health Organization criteria to determine its value in reducing stroke risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, affecting one in four individuals over 40.
- A significant proportion of AF patients (40%) are asymptomatic, posing a risk for stroke.
- Early detection and management of AF can decrease stroke risk by two-thirds.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address common arguments against atrial fibrillation screening.
- To evaluate atrial fibrillation screening based on the World Health Organization's Wilson and Jungner criteria.
- To determine the overall value of AF screening programs.
Main Methods:
- Review of common arguments against atrial fibrillation screening.
- Assessment of AF screening against established World Health Organization screening criteria.
- Analysis of the potential benefits and drawbacks of AF screening.
Main Results:
- Atrial fibrillation screening aligns with key World Health Organization criteria for effective screening programs.
- The benefits of early AF detection, particularly stroke risk reduction, support screening initiatives.
- Addressing counterarguments demonstrates the feasibility and value of implementing AF screening.
Conclusions:
- Atrial fibrillation screening meets the World Health Organization's criteria for a valuable public health intervention.
- Implementing AF screening is supported by its potential to significantly reduce stroke risk.
- Evidence supports the broader adoption of atrial fibrillation screening programs.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with a lifetime risk of one in four of developing AF over the age of 40 years. Around 40% of patients are asymptomatic, which is of concern as AF is a major risk factor for stroke. Early detection and appropriate management reduces stroke risk by two-thirds. Atrial fibrillation screening is now recommended in international guidelines, but there are some common arguments against screening. Overall, to be of value any screening program must fulfil the World Health Organization (WHO) Wilson and Jungner criteria for screening programs. In this paper we address the common arguments, and determine if AF screening fulfils the WHO criteria.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

