Incidence and Time Course for Developing Heart Failure With High-Burden Right Ventricular Pacing
Faisal M Merchant1, Michael H Hoskins2, Dan L Musat2
1From the Cardiology Division, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (F.M.M., M.H.H.); Cardiology Division, Valley Health System, Ridgewood, NJ (D.L.M., S.M.); and Abbott, Sunnyvale, CA (J.B.P., G.J.R., Y.N.). faisal.merchant@emory.edu.
Insights
Patients with complete atrioventricular block (cAVB) receiving pacemakers face a higher risk of developing heart failure (HF) after implantation. This risk is particularly pronounced in younger patients and those with prior atrial fibrillation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Right ventricular pacing is a known contributor to cardiomyopathy.
- The specific impact of complete atrioventricular block (cAVB) on heart failure (HF) development in pacemaker patients requires further characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incidence and time course of heart failure (HF) development in patients following pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block (cAVB).
Main Methods:
- Utilized the MarketScan database (2008-2014) to identify patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.
- Dichotomized patients into groups with and without cAVB, requiring at least one year of enrollment pre- and post-implantation without prior HF diagnosis.
- Assessed new-onset HF in acute (0-6 months) and chronic (6 months to 4 years) phases post-pacemaker implantation.
Main Results:
- The study included 6,994 patients with cAVB and 14,208 without, followed for a median of 2.35 years.
- Patients with cAVB showed a significantly increased risk of new-onset HF in the acute phase (HR, 1.62) and chronic phase (HR, 1.16) post-pacemaker implantation.
- Younger patients (≤55 years) and those with a history of atrial fibrillation had the highest risk of HF associated with cAVB.
Conclusions:
- Complete atrioventricular block (cAVB) is associated with an elevated risk of new-onset heart failure (HF) after pacemaker implantation, likely due to increased right ventricular pacing.
- There is a need for improved methods to identify high-risk patients for HF development during right ventricular pacing.
- Further research should investigate the potential benefits of upfront biventricular pacing for these high-risk individuals.
Background:
Although right ventricular pacing can contribute to cardiomyopathy, the impact of complete atrioventricular block (cAVB) on heart failure (HF) development in pacemaker patients has not been well characterized. We evaluated the incidence and time course for developing HF after pacemaker implantation for cAVB.
Methods And Results:
A MarketScan database identified patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implantation from 2008 to 2014. Patients with cAVB were identified by an atrioventricular node ablation or diagnosis of third-degree AVB. Patients with ≥1 year of continuous MarketScan enrollment before and after implant and without a previous diagnosis of HF were dichotomized into those with cAVB and without AVB. The primary end point was new HF assessed over acute (0-6 months) and chronic (6 months to 4 years) phases post-pacemaker implantation. The cohort included 6994 cAVB patients and 14 208 patients without AVB, followed for 2.35 years (interquartile range, 1.62-3.39 years). After adjustment for baseline covariates, patients with cAVB experienced an increased risk of new-onset HF in the acute phase (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-1.79; P<0.001). Although the risk of HF remained elevated among those with cAVB in the chronic phase, the effect was attenuated (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.25; P<0.001). After pacemaker implantation, younger patients (≤55 years of age) and those with an antecedent history of atrial fibrillation experienced the highest risk of HF associated with cAVB.
Conclusions:
Patients with a diagnosis of cAVB, and thus presumed to have a higher burden of right ventricular pacing, experienced an increased risk of new-onset HF after pacemaker implantation compared with those without AVB. Better tools are needed to identify patients at high risk of developing HF in the setting of right ventricular pacing and to determine whether these patients benefit from upfront biventricular pacing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations


