Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Response to Hohenlohe et al
Bridgett M vonHoldt1, James A Cahill2,3, Ilan Gronau4
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
This study responds to Hohenlohe et al., offering a scientific rebuttal and further insights into the discussed topic. It aims to clarify and advance the ongoing scientific discourse.
Area of Science:
- Scientific discourse
- Response to scientific publication
Background:
- Addressing specific points raised by Hohenlohe et al.
- Providing a counter-perspective or additional data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To refute or clarify aspects of the Hohenlohe et al. paper.
- To contribute to the scientific understanding of the topic.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and critical analysis.
- Presentation of alternative interpretations or data.
Main Results:
- Identification of potential flaws or limitations in the original work.
- Support for an alternative hypothesis or conclusion.
Conclusions:
- The original conclusions of Hohenlohe et al. require re-evaluation.
- Further research is warranted to fully resolve the discrepancies.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

