A Gompertz Model Approach to Microbial Inactivation Kinetics by High-Pressure Processing (HPP): Model Selection and Experimental Validation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Bacteriophage Effectiveness for Biocontrol of Foodborne Pathogens Evaluated via High-Throughput Settings
Published on: August 19, 2021
Vinicio Serment-Moreno1, Claudio Fuentes2, José Antonio Torres1
1Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenierías y Ciencias, Centro de Biotecnología FEMSA, Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Col. Tecnológico, 64849, Monterrey, NL, México.
Abstract:
A recently proposed Gompertz model (GMPZ) approach describing microbial inactivation kinetics by high-pressure processing (HPP) incorporated the initial microbial load (N0 ) and lower microbial quantification limit (Nlim ), and simplified the dynamic effects of come-up time (CUT). The inactivation of Listeria innocua in milk by HPP treatments at 300, 400, 500, and 600 MPa and pressure holding times (thold ) ≤10 min was determined experimentally to validate this model approach. Models based on exponential, logistic-exponential, and inverse functions were evaluated to describe the effect of pressure on the lag time (λ) and maximum inactivation rate (μmax ), whereas the asymptote difference (A) was fixed as A = log10 (N0 /Nlim ). Model performance was statistically evaluated and further validated with additional data obtained at 450 and 550 MPa. All GMPZ models adequately fitted L. innocua data according to the coefficient of determination (R2 ≥ 0.95) but those including a logistic-exponential function for μmax (P) were superior (R2 ≥ 0.97). These GMPZ versions predicted that approximately 597 MPa is the theoretical pressure level (Pλ ) at which microbial inactivation begins during CUT, mathematically defined as λ (P = Pλ ) = tCUT , and matching the value observed on the microbial survival curve at 600 MPa. As pressure increased, predictions tended to slightly underestimate the HPP lethality in the tail section of the survival curve. This may be overseen in practice since the observed microbial counts were below the predicted log10 N values. Overall, the modeling approach is promising, justifying further validation work for other microorganisms and food systems.
More Related Videos
10:03Investigating the Detrimental Effects of Low Pressure Plasma Sterilization on the Survival of Bacillus subtilis Spores Using Live Cell Microscopy
Published on: November 30, 2017
07:39Tools for the Real-Time Assessment of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model
Published on: April 6, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Temperature
Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model