Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity
Published on: April 26, 2012
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials
Patrick Y Wen1, Susan M Chang1, Martin J Van den Bent1
1Patrick Y. Wen and Eudocia Q. Lee, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Susan M. Chang, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Michael A. Vogelbaum, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Martin J. Van den Bent, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and David R. Macdonald, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
Development of novel therapies for CNS tumors requires reliable assessment of response and progression. This requirement has been particularly challenging in neuro-oncology for which contrast enhancement serves as an imperfect surrogate for tumor volume and is influenced by agents that affect vascular permeability, such as antiangiogenic therapies. In addition, most tumors have a nonenhancing component that can be difficult to accurately quantify. To improve the response assessment in neuro-oncology and to standardize the criteria that are used for different CNS tumors, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group was established. This multidisciplinary international working group consists of neuro-oncologists, medical oncologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts in clinical outcomes assessments, working in collaboration with government and industry to enhance the interpretation of clinical trials. The RANO working group was originally created to update response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas and to address such issues as pseudoresponse and nonenhancing tumor progression from antiangiogenic therapies, and pseudoprogression from radiochemotherapy. RANO has expanded to include working groups that are focused on other tumors, including brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, spine tumors, pediatric brain tumors, and meningiomas, as well as other clinical trial end points, such as clinical outcomes assessments, seizures, corticosteroid use, and positron emission tomography imaging. In an effort to standardize the measurement of neurologic function for clinical assessment, the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology scale was drafted. Born out of a workshop conducted by the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and the US Food and Drug Administration, a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol now exists to reduce variability and improve reliability. Efforts by RANO have been widely accepted and are increasingly being used in neuro-oncology trials, although additional refinements will be needed.
Insights
The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group standardizes criteria for evaluating CNS tumor response and progression. Their efforts improve clinical trial interpretation and neuro-oncology research by addressing challenges with contrast enhancement and non-enhancing tumor components.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Assessing treatment response in CNS tumors is challenging due to contrast enhancement limitations and non-enhancing tumor components.
- Antiangiogenic therapies and radiochemotherapy can cause pseudoresponse and pseudoprogression, complicating evaluation.
- Standardized criteria are crucial for reliable interpretation of clinical trials in neuro-oncology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish standardized response assessment criteria for CNS tumors.
- To improve the reliability and interpretation of neuro-oncology clinical trials.
- To address specific challenges in evaluating tumor response, such as pseudoresponse and non-enhancing disease.
Main Methods:
- Formation of the multidisciplinary international Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group.
- Development of updated response criteria for gliomas and expansion to other CNS tumor types.
- Collaboration with government and industry to enhance clinical trial interpretation and standardize imaging protocols.
Main Results:
- RANO criteria have been widely accepted and are increasingly used in neuro-oncology trials.
- Expanded RANO working groups cover diverse CNS tumors and clinical trial endpoints.
- Standardized brain tumor imaging protocols and neurologic assessment scales have been developed.
Conclusions:
- The RANO working group has significantly advanced standardized response assessment in neuro-oncology.
- RANO criteria enhance the reliability and interpretation of clinical trials for various CNS tumors.
- Ongoing refinements are necessary to further improve response assessment in neuro-oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

