Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials

Patrick Y Wen1, Susan M Chang1, Martin J Van den Bent1

  • 1Patrick Y. Wen and Eudocia Q. Lee, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Susan M. Chang, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Michael A. Vogelbaum, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Martin J. Van den Bent, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and David R. Macdonald, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Insights

The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group standardizes criteria for evaluating CNS tumor response and progression. Their efforts improve clinical trial interpretation and neuro-oncology research by addressing challenges with contrast enhancement and non-enhancing tumor components.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Assessing treatment response in CNS tumors is challenging due to contrast enhancement limitations and non-enhancing tumor components.
  • Antiangiogenic therapies and radiochemotherapy can cause pseudoresponse and pseudoprogression, complicating evaluation.
  • Standardized criteria are crucial for reliable interpretation of clinical trials in neuro-oncology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish standardized response assessment criteria for CNS tumors.
  • To improve the reliability and interpretation of neuro-oncology clinical trials.
  • To address specific challenges in evaluating tumor response, such as pseudoresponse and non-enhancing disease.

Main Methods:

  • Formation of the multidisciplinary international Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group.
  • Development of updated response criteria for gliomas and expansion to other CNS tumor types.
  • Collaboration with government and industry to enhance clinical trial interpretation and standardize imaging protocols.

Main Results:

  • RANO criteria have been widely accepted and are increasingly used in neuro-oncology trials.
  • Expanded RANO working groups cover diverse CNS tumors and clinical trial endpoints.
  • Standardized brain tumor imaging protocols and neurologic assessment scales have been developed.

Conclusions:

  • The RANO working group has significantly advanced standardized response assessment in neuro-oncology.
  • RANO criteria enhance the reliability and interpretation of clinical trials for various CNS tumors.
  • Ongoing refinements are necessary to further improve response assessment in neuro-oncology.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.1K
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.8K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.9K