Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
Estimation of the effective yield properties of human trabecular bone using nonlinear micro-finite element analyses
Patrik Wili1, Ghislain Maquer2, Jarunan Panyasantisuk1
1Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Micro-finite element ([Formula: see text]FE) analyses are often used to determine the apparent mechanical properties of trabecular bone volumes. Yet, these apparent properties depend strongly on the applied boundary conditions (BCs) for the limited size of volumes that can be obtained from human bones. To attenuate the influence of the BCs, we computed the yield properties of samples loaded via a surrounding layer of trabecular bone ("embedded configuration"). Thirteen cubic volumes (10.6 mm side length) were collected from [Formula: see text]CT reconstructions of human vertebrae and femora and converted into [Formula: see text]FE models. An isotropic elasto-plastic material model was chosen for bone tissue, and nonlinear [Formula: see text]FE analyses of six uniaxial, shear, and multi-axial load cases were simulated to determine the yield properties of a subregion (5.3 mm side length) of each volume. Three BCs were tested. Kinematic uniform BCs (KUBCs: each boundary node is constrained with uniform displacements) and periodicity-compatible mixed uniform BCs (PMUBCs: each boundary node is constrained with a uniform combination of displacements and tractions mimicking the periodic BCs for an orthotropic material) were directly applied to the subregions, while the embedded configuration was achieved by applying PMUBCs on the larger volumes instead. Yield stresses and strains, and element damage at yield were finally compared across BCs. Our findings indicate that yield strains do not depend on the BCs. However, KUBCs significantly overestimate yield stresses obtained in the embedded configuration (+43.1 ± 27.9%). PMUBCs underestimate (-10.0 ± 11.2%), but not significantly, yield stresses in the embedded situation. Similarly, KUBCs lead to higher damage levels than PMUBCs (+51.0 ± 16.9%) and embedded configurations (+48.4 ± 15.0%). PMUBCs are better suited for reproducing the loading conditions in subregions of the trabecular bone and deliver a fair estimation of their effective (asymptotic) yield properties.

