Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

04:44
Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
Published on: July 21, 2021
5.1K
Coevolution of Synchronization and Cooperation in Costly Networked Interactions.
Alberto Antonioni1,2,3, Alessio Cardillo3,4
1Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Physical Review Letters
|June 24, 2017
Summary
This study explores costly interactions in synchronization, revealing that network topology is crucial for cooperation to emerge and thrive. Different network structures impact synchronization at both individual and population levels.
Area of Science:
- Complex Systems
- Evolutionary Game Theory
- Network Science
Background:
- Synchronization studies often overlook the costs associated with interactions.
- Introducing costs creates a scenario where individuals choose between cooperation (paying a cost) or free-riding.
- Synchronization can emerge as an outcome of evolutionary game dynamics based on benefit-to-cost ratios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the emergence of cooperation and synchronization in populations with costly interactions.
- To determine the role of network topology in fostering cooperation and synchronization.
- To analyze how different network structures influence synchronization at microscopic and macroscopic scales.
Main Methods:
- Modeling networked populations of Kuramoto oscillators.
- Simulating evolutionary game dynamics where individuals adapt behavior based on past benefit-to-cost ratios.
- Analyzing the impact of various network topologies on cooperation and synchronization.
Main Results:
- Network topology is essential for the emergence and success of cooperation.
- Different network structures exhibit varying capacities to promote synchronization.
- Cooperation and synchronization are influenced by the interplay between interaction costs and network architecture.
Conclusions:
- Costly interactions introduce a game-theoretic dimension to synchronization phenomena.
- Network topology plays a pivotal role in shaping cooperative behaviors and synchronization patterns.
- Understanding network structure is key to comprehending the evolution of synchronization in populations.
Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
5.2K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.2K
Symbiosis
37.8K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
37.8K
Social Exchange Theory
570
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
570
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
9.1K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
9.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
3.2K
3.2K

