Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

545
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
545
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

554
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
554
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

1.5K
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Task-induced topological and geometrical changes in whole-brain dynamics predict cognitive individual differences.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Distributed cortical network dynamics of binocular convergent eye movements in humans.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Hierarchical Bayesian Regression for experimental psychology: a case study of cognitive control.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Don't Tell Us How Strong It Feels! Converging and Discriminant Validity of an Indirect Measure of Emotional Evidence Accumulation Efficiency.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same author

Beyond Valence and Arousal: Distributed Facial Patterns Linked to Specific Emotions Cannot be Reduced to Core Affect.

Affective science·2026
Same author

Symbolic fractions have greater neural representational similarity with discretized than continuous nonsymbolic proportional reasoning.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
08:59

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

11.0K

A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.

Michael W Cole1, Lauren M Patrick2, Nachshon Meiran3

  • 1Psychology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130, United States; Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, NJ 07102, United States.

Acta Psychologica
|June 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rapid instructed task learning (RITL) relies on proactive cognitive control to maintain goal information. This study shows novelty costs are reduced with more preparation time, highlighting the role of active maintenance in learning new tasks.

Keywords:
Cognitive controlProactive controlRapid instructed task learning

More Related Videos

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

11.1K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats
08:59

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

11.0K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

11.1K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Humans exhibit rapid learning of new tasks from instructions, a process termed rapid instructed task learning (RITL).
  • RITL is thought to involve forming and actively maintaining new associations between long-term memory representations.
  • This maintenance is crucial for successful task implementation, especially under high cognitive control demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that RITL depends on a proactive mode of cognitive control.
  • To examine how active maintenance of goal-relevant information influences the learning of novel tasks.

Main Methods:

  • A cognitive paradigm with 60 novel and 4 practiced tasks was employed, using identical rules and stimuli across both.
  • Behavioral costs associated with novel task performance were compared to practiced tasks, even when intermixed.
  • The impact of preparation time (time-limited vs. self-paced) on novelty costs was assessed.

Main Results:

  • A significant behavioral cost was observed for novel tasks compared to practiced tasks, persisting even when task-switching effects were controlled.
  • Novelty costs were most pronounced under time-limited preparation conditions.
  • In self-paced conditions, longer preparation times for novel tasks correlated with improved performance, indicating enhanced proactive control.

Conclusions:

  • Proactive cognitive control plays a critical role in the human ability to rapidly learn novel tasks from instructions.
  • Active maintenance of goal-relevant information is a key mechanism supporting RITL.
  • Understanding proactive control mechanisms can inform strategies for enhancing learning and cognitive flexibility.