Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Quality of Life of Vietnamese Ostomy Patients: A Multidimensional Assessment Using the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (CoH-QoL-OQ).

Cureus·2026

Same author

Comparative Outcomes and Management of Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis After Contemporary Standard and Pelvic-Fascia-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Techniques.

JU open plus·2026

Same author

Robotic buccal mucosal graft ureteroplasty: a contemporary multi-institutional experience.

World journal of urology·2026

Same author

Robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction in renal transplant recipients: a multi-Institutional review of outcomes and complications.

World journal of urology·2026

Same author

Single Saliva Sample Linezolid Dosing for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Plasma and Saliva.

Clinical pharmacokinetics·2026

Same author

Single Saliva Sample Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Levofloxacin for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Clinical pharmacokinetics·2026

Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026

Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026

Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026

Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026

Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026

Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Dividing Attention Between Tasks: Testing Whether Explicit Payoff Functions Elicit Optimal Dual-Task Performance.

George D Farmer^1,2, Christian P Janssen³, Anh T Nguyen^1,4

¹UCL Interaction Centre, University College London.

Cognitive Science

|June 28, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People can adapt their task switching strategies to maximize rewards in dual-task scenarios. This adaptive behavior is learned quickly but has limits in optimizing complex payoff functions.

Keywords:

Cognitive control Multitasking Optimization Rational behavior Task interleaving Time allocation

More Related Videos

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human-Computer Interaction
Neuroscience

Background:

Optimizing performance in dual-task settings is crucial for efficient task management.
Understanding how individuals allocate attention between concurrent tasks informs cognitive load theories.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate people's ability to adapt their task-switching strategies for dual-task performance optimization.
To determine the learning rate and stability of adaptive dual-task strategies.

Main Methods:

Participants performed a number entry task concurrently with a cursor control task.
A single, combined performance score (payoff function) was provided, with variations across conditions.
Task-switching strategies and learning were analyzed based on performance feedback.

Main Results:

Participants successfully adapted their task-interleaving strategies to maximize performance under different payoff functions.
Adaptive dual-task behavior was learned rapidly (within 2-3 minutes) and remained stable.
Observed limitations in optimizing complex payoff functions were identified.

Conclusions:

Individuals demonstrate significant adaptability and flexibility in prioritizing and allocating attention during dual-task execution.
Learned strategies for dual-task optimization are efficient but constrained by the complexity of performance feedback.
This research provides insights into human adaptive control and attentional resource management.