Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

719

Performance Indicators in Spine Surgery.

Godefroy Hardy St-Pierre1, Michael H Yang2, Jonathan Bourget-Murray2

  • 1University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Spine
|June 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Normative Relationships Between Spinopelvic Alignment and Femoroacetabular Orientation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Global spine journal·2025
Same author

Differences in Perioperative Outcomes Between Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Previous Proximal Femur Fracture and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty today·2025
Same author

Does introduction of a cemented polished taper-slip femoral stem reduce early periprosthetic fracture risk with anterior approach total hip arthroplasty? A case-matched study.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2025
Same author

Mapping <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> at Early and Late Stages of Infection in a Clinically Representative Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection Rat Model.

Microorganisms·2024
Same author

National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Guidelines for Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures: Examining Satisfaction With the Guidelines and Effects on Outcomes.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2024
Same author

Revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture: epidemiology, outcomes, and factors associated with success.

Annals of joint·2024
Same journal

Comparing those Most Satisfied versus Least Satisfied Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Are there Differences in Baseline Characteristics?

Spine·2026
Same journal

Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Multicenter Analysis of Revision Strategies and Outcomes.

Spine·2026
Same journal

To the Editor "Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Statin Usage Are Associated With Rates of Pseudarthrosis Following Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion" by Lavu et al.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Sarcopenia Increases Adjacent Segment Degeneration Risk within 3 Years of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Two-Year Cervical Alignment Trajectories and Associated Radiographic Factors after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Association of C7 Laminoplasty and Decompression Construct Length With Postoperative Axial Symptoms After Cervical Expansive Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty.

Spine·2026
See all related articles

Performance indicators in spine surgery are underdeveloped. Current outcome metrics need refinement and benchmarking to establish true performance measurement in this surgical field.

Area of Science:

  • Spine surgery outcomes research
  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Health services research

Background:

  • The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act emphasizes value-based purchasing in healthcare.
  • Measuring healthcare value through performance indicators is crucial for this new paradigm.
  • Spine surgery requires robust metrics to assess and improve patient value.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the current use of performance indicators in spine surgery.
  • To identify existing measures of performance within spine surgery literature.
  • To assess the suitability of current metrics as true performance indicators.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review following PRISMA-P methodology.
  • Searched MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar (1980-2016).

More Related Videos

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
05:52

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

822
Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

18.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

719
Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
05:52

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

822
Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

18.9K
  • Reviewed 27 full-text articles and reports for performance measures, assessing against established standards, risk adjustment, and benchmarking.
  • Main Results:

    • Despite extensive searching, no true performance indicators specific to spine surgery were identified.
    • Numerous articles presented performance measures, but these lacked key criteria for established indicators.
    • Analysis revealed the foundational elements for developing future spine surgery performance indicators.

    Conclusions:

    • Performance measurement in spine surgery is in its early stages.
    • Existing clinical outcome metrics require significant refinement to function as performance indicators.
    • Spine surgery registries provide a basis, but benchmarking is essential for accurate performance evaluation.