Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

4.1K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
4.1K
Midpoint Rule01:20

Midpoint Rule

83
Approximating areas under curved boundaries is a common problem in applied mathematics, particularly when an exact calculation is difficult or impractical. One effective numerical method for this purpose is the Midpoint Rule, which provides an estimate of the area under a curve by using rectangular approximations over a specified interval.Description of the Midpoint RuleThe Midpoint Rule begins by dividing the given interval into a number of equal subintervals. For each subinterval, the...
83
Rules for Defining Functions01:29

Rules for Defining Functions

419
A relation is a function if each input x is associated with exactly one output y. For example, the equation      y = 2x + 5 defines a function because every value of x yields a unique y. However, x = y² + 1 is not a function of x, since a single x-value, such as x = 2, corresponds to two possible y-values: y = 1 and y = -1.The vertical line test helps determine whether a graph represents a function. If a vertical line intersects a curve more than once, the curve fails...
419
Rate-Determining Steps03:08

Rate-Determining Steps

37.8K
Relating Reaction Mechanisms
In a multistep reaction mechanism, one of the elementary steps progresses significantly slower than the others. This slowest step is called the rate-limiting step (or rate-determining step). A reaction cannot proceed faster than its slowest step, and hence, the rate-determining step limits the overall reaction rate.
The concept of rate-determining step can be understood from the analogy of a 4-lane freeway with a short-stretch of traffic-bottleneck caused due to...
37.8K
Global Regulatory Systems01:28

Global Regulatory Systems

787
Global regulatory systems in bacteria enable rapid and coordinated responses to environmental changes by integrating sensory inputs with gene expression, ensuring efficient adaptation to fluctuating conditions. Key global regulatory mechanisms include regulons, two-component systems, sigma factors, and secondary messengers.Regulons and Global RegulatorsA regulon is a collection of genes and operons controlled by a common global regulator. These regulators enable bacteria to prioritize resource...
787
Mason's Rule01:20

Mason's Rule

1.2K
Mason's rule is a powerful tool in control systems and signal processing. It simplifies the calculation of transfer functions from signal-flow graphs. This method leverages various elements, including loop gains, forward-path gains, and non-touching loops, to determine the transfer function efficiently.
Loop gain is determined by identifying and tracing a path from a node back to itself. This involves computing the product of branch gains along the loop. Each loop's gain is crucial for further...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical Challenges in the Delivery of Family-Centered Nursing Care.

Journal of family nursing·2026
Same author

Risk-calibrated sharing of human brain data.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Replacing Surrogate Decision-Making with Supported Decision-Making for Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Intellectual Disability and Supported Decision-Making in Clinical Research: Anticipating Ethical Challenges.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Using Supported Decision-Making to Promote Value-Aligned Research Participation.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Supported Decision-Making and the Inclusion of People who Lack Decisional Capacity in Greater than Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
14:01

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

43.4K

A Proposed Process for Reliably Updating the Common Rule.

Benjamin E Berkman1, David Wendler2, Haley K Sullivan2

  • 1a National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and National Human Genome Research Institute.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB
|June 30, 2017
PubMed
Summary

The Common Rule revision process yielded modest changes, missing opportunities to update research regulations for vulnerable populations. Regular reassessment and a mechanism for timely updates are recommended for the Common Rule.

Keywords:
Common Ruleframework legislationpublic consultation

More Related Videos

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
13:48

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

13.6K
Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

493

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition
14:01

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

43.4K
Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
13:48

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

13.6K
Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

493

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Ethics
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • The Common Rule underwent a lengthy revision process, taking nearly a decade.
  • The final revisions were modest compared to initial proposals in the advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) and notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the recent Common Rule revision process and its outcomes.
  • To advocate for a more dynamic and responsive regulatory framework for human subjects research.
  • To propose mechanisms for regular reassessment and substantive amendment of the Common Rule.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the Common Rule revision process, including the ANPRM and NPRM stages.
  • Evaluation of the scope and impact of the final Common Rule revisions.
  • Identification of limitations, particularly concerning regulations for vulnerable populations.

Main Results:

  • The recent Common Rule revision resulted in limited changes, failing to address key areas like research with vulnerable populations (e.g., children, prisoners).
  • The revision process did not incorporate many ambitious proposals from earlier stages.
  • The current process for revising the Common Rule is too slow, creating a significant delay before the next potential update.

Conclusions:

  • The Common Rule revision process missed a critical opportunity to implement necessary updates, especially for vulnerable groups.
  • There is a need for a structured mechanism to regularly reassess and amend the Common Rule to ensure it remains relevant and effective.
  • Future revision processes should be designed to facilitate timely and substantive changes to human subjects research regulations.