Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

08:05
A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published on: November 8, 2019
7.9K
Microsurgical Flaps in Repair and Reconstruction of the Hand
Shimpei Ono1, Sandeep J Sebastin2, Hiroyuki Ohi3
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.
Hand Clinics
|July 5, 2017
Summary
This study highlights the pedicle perforator flap as an ideal option for hand soft-tissue coverage, emphasizing functional and aesthetic reconstruction. Further comparative studies are needed to guide optimal flap selection for hand defects.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Hand Surgery
Background:
- Soft-tissue defects in the hand present significant reconstructive challenges.
- Achieving optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes requires careful flap selection.
- Current decision-making for hand flap coverage often relies on surgeon experience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a strategy for soft-tissue coverage of the hand.
- To advocate for the pedicle perforator flap as an ideal reconstructive option.
- To identify the need for comparative studies to refine flap selection algorithms.
Main Methods:
- The authors discuss their strategy for hand soft-tissue coverage.
- The principle of "like with like" reconstruction is emphasized.
- The pedicle perforator flap is proposed as a key reconstructive tool.
Main Results:
- The pedicle perforator flap is considered ideal for hand reconstruction.
- Selecting the optimal flap requires balancing function, aesthetics, donor-site morbidity, and patient satisfaction.
- A definitive decision-making algorithm is currently challenging due to limited comparative evidence.
Conclusions:
- The pedicle perforator flap offers excellent potential for hand soft-tissue reconstruction.
- Further evidence-based comparative studies are essential for optimizing flap selection.
- Evaluating hand function, aesthetics, donor site morbidity, and patient satisfaction is crucial for future research.

