Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Incidental findings on multiparametric MRI performed for evaluation of prostate cancer
Rachael L Sherrer1, Win Shun Lai1, John V Thomas2
1Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Purpose:
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and MRI/Ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy are relatively new techniques for improved detection, staging, and active surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa). As with all imaging modalities, MRI reveals incidental findings (IFs) which carry the risk of increased cost, patient anxiety, and iatrogenic morbidity due to workup of IFs. Herein, we report the IFs from 684 MRIs for evaluation of PCa and consider their characteristics and clinical significance.
Methods:
Patients underwent mp-MRI prostate protocol incorporating triplanar T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI as well as a post-contrast abdominopelvic MRI with the primary indication of detection or evaluation of PCa. A total of 684 consecutive prostate MRI reports performed in a series of 580 patients were reviewed. All extraprostatic findings reported were logged and then categorized by organ system and potential clinical significance.
Results:
There were 349 true IFs found in 233 (40%) of the 580 patients. One hundred nineteen additional extraprostatic findings were unsuspected but directly related to PCa staging, while the 349 IFs were unrelated and thus truly incidental beyond study indication. While the majority of true IFs were non-urologic, only 6.6% of IFs were considered clinically significant, non-urologic findings, and more than a third of MRI reports had urologic IFs not related to PCa.
Conclusions:
Rates of incidental findings on prostate indication MRI are similar to other abdominopelvic imaging studies. However, only 6.6% of the IFs were considered to be clinically significant non-urologic findings. Further investigations are needed to assess downstream workup of these IFs and resulting costs.
Insights
Incidental findings on prostate MRI are common, but only 6.6% are clinically significant non-urologic issues. Further research is needed to understand the impact of these prostate cancer imaging results.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Urology
Background:
- Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) and MRI/Ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy enhance prostate cancer (PCa) detection, staging, and surveillance.
- Incidental findings (IFs) on MRI can increase costs, patient anxiety, and morbidity.
- Understanding the characteristics and clinical significance of IFs is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report and analyze incidental findings (IFs) from 684 prostate MRIs performed for PCa evaluation.
- To determine the clinical significance of these IFs.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed 684 prostate mp-MRI reports from 580 patients.
- Identified and categorized all extraprostatic findings by organ system and clinical significance.
- Differentiated between true IFs and findings related to PCa staging.
Main Results:
- 349 true IFs were identified in 233 patients (40%).
- Only 6.6% of IFs were clinically significant, non-urologic findings.
- Over a third of reports contained urologic IFs unrelated to PCa.
Conclusions:
- Incidental findings on prostate MRIs are frequent, comparable to other abdominopelvic imaging.
- A small percentage of IFs are clinically significant non-urologic findings.
- Further investigation is required to assess the downstream workup and costs associated with IFs.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

