Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

06:28
Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
Published on: January 30, 2020
13.3K
Performance of a high-resolution depth encoding PET detector using barium sulfate reflector
Zhonghua Kuang1, Xiaohui Wang1, Cheng Li1
1Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, People's Republic of China.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|July 7, 2017
Summary
Researchers evaluated a new barium sulfate (BaSO4) reflector for small animal positron emission tomography (PET) detectors. The BaSO4 reflector significantly improved crystal clarity in PET scanners, offering a cost-effective solution for enhanced preclinical imaging.
Area of Science:
- Preclinical biomedical research
- Medical imaging technology
- Detector physics
Background:
- Small animal positron emission tomography (PET) is crucial for preclinical research.
- Current PET scanner performance is limited by detector capabilities.
- High spatial resolution and sensitivity require depth-encoding detectors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of a lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) array using barium sulfate (BaSO4) as an inter-crystal reflector.
- To compare the BaSO4 reflector's performance against the commonly used enhanced specular reflector (ESR).
- To assess the potential of BaSO4 for developing advanced small animal PET scanners.
Main Methods:
- Fabricated and tested two dual-ended readout LYSO arrays (18x18 crystals, ~0.62x0.62x20 mm3).
- One array used BaSO4 powder as the inter-crystal reflector; the other used ESR.
- Measured flood histograms, energy resolution, depth of interaction (DOI) resolution, and timing resolution.
Main Results:
- The BaSO4 array exhibited significantly better flood histograms, clearly resolving all crystals.
- The ESR array showed less clear crystal resolution, particularly at the edges.
- Average energy resolution was similar (15.2% for BaSO4, 15.3% for ESR).
- DOI resolution was worse for BaSO4 (2.19 mm) compared to ESR (1.76 mm).
- Timing resolution was comparable (~1.6 ns) for both arrays.
Conclusions:
- The BaSO4 reflector offers superior crystal identification in dual-ended readout PET detectors compared to ESR.
- This new reflector enables the development of cost-effective small animal PET scanners with uniform high spatial resolution and sensitivity.

