Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Central aortic pulse pressure, thrombogenicity and cardiovascular risk
Gailing Chen1,2, Kevin P Bliden3, Rahul Chaudhary4
1Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Insights
High central aortic pulse pressure (CPP) and thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (TIP-FCS) are independent predictors of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Their combined presence significantly amplifies ischemic risk, highlighting a crucial link between vascular pressure and thrombogenicity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis
- Clinical Cardiology
Background:
- High central aortic pulse pressure (CPP) and thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (TIP-FCS) are independently linked to ischemic outcomes in coronary artery disease patients.
- The combined ischemic risk and interrelation between CPP and TIP-FCS have not been previously investigated in a single study.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish cut-off values for CPP and TIP-FCS measured during cardiac catheterization that predict long-term major adverse cardiovascular events.
- To analyze the independent and combined predictive value of CPP and TIP-FCS on ischemic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 334 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
- Assessment of thrombogenicity using thrombelastography to determine TIP-FCS.
- Follow-up for up to 3 years to record major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and recurrent ischemic events.
Main Results:
- Patients experiencing primary or secondary endpoints exhibited significantly higher CPP and TIP-FCS compared to those without events.
- CPP >60 mmHg and TIP-FCS >69 mm were identified as independent predictors of the primary endpoint.
- The combination of CPP >60 mmHg and TIP-FCS >69 mm was associated with a markedly increased risk of primary endpoint occurrence (Hazard Ratio: 5.4).
Conclusions:
- High CPP and elevated TIP-FCS are interrelated and independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
- The simultaneous presence of high CPP and high TIP-FCS significantly enhances the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
- Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanistic link between central aortic pulse pressure and thrombogenicity.
Abstract:
High central aortic pulse pressure (CPP) and thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (TIP-FCS) have been associated with ischemic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease in separate studies. But, the ischemic risk associated with these factors has never been analyzed in a single study and their interrelation is unknown. The primary aim of the study was to establish cut points for CPP and TIP-FCS measured at the time of catheterization associated with long term major adverse cardiovascular events. We enrolled 334 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and assessed thrombogenicity by thrombelastography. Patients were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke and the secondary endpoint was occurrence of the primary endpoint or recurrent ischemic events requiring hospitalization. Patients with primary and secondary endpoint occurrence had higher CPP (83 ± 20 vs. 60 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.0001; 70 ± 21 vs. 59 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.0001, respectively) and TIP-FCS (68.5 ± 5.8 vs. 65.5 ± 5.0 mm, p = 0.008; 67.4 ± 5.9 vs. 65.2 ± 4.8 mm, p = 0.001, respectively). CPP >60 mmHg and TIP-FCS >69 mm were both independent predictors of primary endpoint occurrence (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.02, respectively). ROC analysis for CPP and TIP-FCS showed a C-statistic of 0.81 (p < 0.0001) and 0.68 (p = 0.007) for the primary endpoint, respectively. Patients with CPP >60 mmHg had higher TIP-FCS (66.8 ± 5.1 vs. 64.8 ± 5.0 mm, p < 0.001) and primary and secondary endpoint occurrence (13 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.0001 and 31.8 vs. 14.4%, p = 0.0002, respectively). CPP >60 mmHg + TIP-FCS > 69 mm was associated with a markedly increased risk of primary endpoint occurrence [HR (95% CI) 5.4(2.3-12.5), p = 0.0001]. High CPP and thrombogenicity are interrelated; each are independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk; and simultaneous presence markedly enhances risk. The mechanistic link between CPP and thrombogenicity deserves further study.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

