Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026
Mass-Sensitive Particle Tracking to Characterize Membrane-Associated Macromolecule Dynamics
Published on: February 18, 2022
PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging
Tim Hilgenfeld1, Marcel Prager2,3, Alexander Heil2
1Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. tim.hilgenfeld@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Objectives:
Dental MRI is often impaired by artefacts due to metallic dental materials. Several sequences were developed to reduce susceptibility artefacts. Here, we evaluated a set of sequences for artefact reduction for dental MRI for the first time.
Methods:
Artefact volume, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality were assessed on a 3-T MRI for pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), multiple-slab acquisition with view angle tilting gradient, based on a sampling perfection with application-optimised contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence (MSVAT-SPACE), slice-encoding for metal-artefact correction (SEMAC) and compared to a standard SPACE and a standard turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence. Field-of-view and acquisition times were chosen to enable in vivo application. Two implant-supported prostheses were tested (porcelain fused to metal non-precious alloy and monolithic zirconia).
Results:
Smallest artefact was measured for TSE sequences with no difference between the standard TSE and the SEMAC. MSVAT-SPACE reduced artefacts about 56% compared to the standard SPACE. Effect of the PETRA was dependent on sample used. Image quality and SNR were comparable for all sequences except PETRA, which yielded poor results.
Conclusion:
There is no benefit in terms of artefact reduction for SEMAC compared to standard TSE. Usage of MSVAT-SPACE is advantageous since artefacts are reduced and higher resolution is achieved.
Key Points:
• SEMAC is not superior to TSE in terms of artefact reduction. • MSVAT-SPACE reduces susceptibility artefacts while maintaining comparable image quality. • PETRA reduces susceptibility artefacts depending on material but offers poor image quality.
