Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

2.2K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
2.2K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

1.1K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.2K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

503
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
503
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Defining Success and Failure In Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Meta-epidemiologic Study Toward A Core Outcome Set.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026
Same author

A systematic review supporting the Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines on central precocious puberty.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

Evaluating data extraction error by a large language model from randomised controlled trials: a large-scale empirical study.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Evidence contamination: what it is and why it matters.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Using Large Language Models to Address Contextual Questions in Systematic Reviews.

Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods·2026
Same journal

Early invasive strategy should be performed within 72 hours in high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Evidence-based medicine·2017
Same journal

Ten essential papers for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Evidence-based medicine·2017
Same journal

A meta-analysis of positive airway pressure treatment for cardiovascular prevention: why mix apples and pears?

Evidence-based medicine·2017
Same journal

What evidence affects clinical practice? An analysis of Evidence-Based Medicine commentaries.

Evidence-based medicine·2017
Same journal

Evaluation of a 0-hour/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T1.

Evidence-based medicine·2017
Same journal

Journal Clubs: 2. Why and how to run them and how to publish them.

Evidence-based medicine·2017
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.

Mohammad Hassan Murad1, Zhen Wang1

  • 1Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Evidence-Based Medicine
|July 14, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces reporting guidelines for meta-epidemiological methodology studies, adapting existing PRISMA standards. These guidelines aim to improve clarity and transparency in reporting research findings.

Keywords:
epidemiology

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Methodology of scientific research
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Published research requires clear and transparent reporting for effective evidence appraisal and replication.
  • Existing reporting guidelines are insufficient for meta-epidemiological methodology studies.
  • Meta-epidemiological studies analyze the impact of study characteristics on observed effects using systematic review or meta-analysis approaches.

Framework:

  • This guideline adapts items from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA).
  • The framework is tailored to the unique context of meta-epidemiological studies.
  • Focuses on reporting standards where the unit of analysis is a study, not individual patients.

Implementation:

  • Presents adapted reporting checklist items for meta-epidemiological studies.
  • Provides a structured approach for researchers conducting meta-epidemiological analyses.
  • Aims to enhance the quality and reproducibility of meta-epidemiological research.

Implications:

  • Improved clarity and transparency in reporting meta-epidemiological studies.
  • Facilitates better appraisal and use of evidence from meta-epidemiological research.
  • Enables replication of meta-epidemiological studies by other researchers.