Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

9.1K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
9.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.2K
3.2K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.4K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.4K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.6K
2.6K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.4K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergent Homeostasis and Degeneracy From Multi-Dimensional Attractors.

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2026
Same author

Prevention of ubiquitination at K6 and K9 in mutant huntingtin exacerbates disease pathology in a knock-in mouse model.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Revealing acute consequences of rapid degradation of synaptic fusion proteins at individual synapses using Auxin-Inducible Degron 2 technology.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

The Brain's Best Kept Secret Is Its Degenerate Structure.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Peripheral sequestration of huntingtin delays neuronal death and depends on N-terminal ubiquitination.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Nonlethal deleterious mutation-induced stress accelerates bacterial aging.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

3D Modeling of Dendritic Spines with Synaptic Plasticity
07:13

3D Modeling of Dendritic Spines with Synaptic Plasticity

Published on: May 18, 2020

7.4K

Cooperative stochastic binding and unbinding explain synaptic size dynamics and statistics.

Aseel Shomar1,2,3, Lukas Geyrhofer1,2, Noam E Ziv2,4

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

Plos Computational Biology
|July 14, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Synaptic size fluctuations are explained by cooperative molecule dynamics at the postsynaptic membrane. This mesoscopic model reveals how microscopic processes drive macroscopic synaptic remodeling and population-level properties.

More Related Videos

An Optical Assay for Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Cultured Neurons Overexpressing Presynaptic Proteins
09:33

An Optical Assay for Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Cultured Neurons Overexpressing Presynaptic Proteins

Published on: June 26, 2018

8.0K
Evaluation of Synaptic Multiplicity Using Whole-cell Patch-clamp Electrophysiology
10:52

Evaluation of Synaptic Multiplicity Using Whole-cell Patch-clamp Electrophysiology

Published on: April 23, 2019

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

3D Modeling of Dendritic Spines with Synaptic Plasticity
07:13

3D Modeling of Dendritic Spines with Synaptic Plasticity

Published on: May 18, 2020

7.4K
An Optical Assay for Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Cultured Neurons Overexpressing Presynaptic Proteins
09:33

An Optical Assay for Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Cultured Neurons Overexpressing Presynaptic Proteins

Published on: June 26, 2018

8.0K
Evaluation of Synaptic Multiplicity Using Whole-cell Patch-clamp Electrophysiology
10:52

Evaluation of Synaptic Multiplicity Using Whole-cell Patch-clamp Electrophysiology

Published on: April 23, 2019

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Synapses exhibit significant size fluctuations over hours to days.
  • Understanding the link between molecular dynamics and synaptic size is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if spontaneous microscopic dynamics of synaptic molecules explain macroscopic synaptic size fluctuations.
  • To develop a mesoscopic model connecting molecular dynamics to synaptic size and population properties.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mesoscopic, stochastic biophysical model.
  • Incorporated cooperativity in molecular assimilation and removal processes.
  • Simulated synaptic remodeling dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Model reproduced experimentally observed features like nanoclusters and skewed size distributions.
  • Demonstrated fluctuations in individual synaptic sizes and stable population distributions.
  • Showcased scaling of distributions in response to perturbations.

Conclusions:

  • Cooperative dynamics of synaptic molecules are fundamental to synaptic remodeling.
  • Microscopic processes, particularly cooperativity, dictate macroscopic synaptic structure and dynamics.
  • The model provides a conceptual framework for understanding synaptic plasticity.