Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Paravalvular leak versus need for permanent pacemaker after TAVR: Sailing between Scylla and Charybdis
Mehmet Cilingiroglu1,2, Konstantinos Marmagkiolis3
1School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract:
Absence or minimization of PVL after TAVR and its potential association with higher rates of PPM placement has been the Achilles' heel of TAVR procedures. Pre-existing RBBB and depth of implantation are independent predictors of PPM need after Lotus valve implantation. Optimization of device design, increased operator experience, and focus on accurate device placement seem to result in decreased need for PPM after Lotus valve implantation.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

