Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions
Sercan Okutucu1, Mehmet Cilingiroglu2,3, Marc D Feldman4
1Department of Cardiology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Insights
Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) by identifying significant blockages. Newer methods offer safe and effective alternatives to traditional fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is an alternative, but PCI offers reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when guided by lesion significance.
- Despite evidence, physiology-guided PCI is underutilized in clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence supporting physiology-guided PCI.
- To summarize current methods for assessing coronary stenosis physiology.
- To highlight the importance of accurate lesion assessment for revascularization decisions.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on coronary physiology assessment.
- Discussion of fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the gold standard.
- Introduction of non-hyperemic ratios and quantitative flow reserve as alternative indices.
Main Results:
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the established standard for lesion severity assessment.
- Non-hyperemic indices and quantitative flow reserve demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
- Physiological assessment resolves ambiguities from coronary angiography, guiding treatment decisions.
Conclusions:
- Accurate physiological assessment of coronary stenosis is crucial for optimal PCI outcomes.
- Technological advancements offer alternatives to traditional FFR, improving patient care.
- Increased adoption of physiology-guided PCI can enhance MACE reduction in CAD patients.
Purpose Of Review:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a commonly used treatment option in coronary artery disease (CAD). Reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in those randomized to PCI compared to optimal medical therapy have been demonstrated only if it is performed for physiologically significant coronary lesions. Despite data demonstrating improved outcomes primarily in stable CAD and then acute settings, physiology-guided PCI remains underutilized. This review summarizes the evidence and commonly used methods for physiologic assessment of coronary stenosis.
Recent Findings:
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for the analysis of lesion severity. Its use is limited by the need for adenosine, which adds time, complexity, and potential adverse effects. Non-hyperemic instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided revascularization and quantitative flow reserve ratio assessment both have shown safety and effectiveness with improved patient outcomes. Coronary physiological assessment solves the ambiguity of coronary angiography. Detecting physiologically significant stenoses is crucial to decide which lesion needs to be treated. Technological advances have led to the development of new assessment indices in addition to FFR.
More Related Videos
07:53Standardized Rat Coronary Ring Preparation and Real-Time Recording of Dynamic Tension Changes Along Vessel Diameter
Published on: June 16, 2022
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests