Early versus delayed coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction

Le Dung Ha1, Gbolahan Ogunbayo, Ayman Elbadawi

  • 1aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York bUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Insights

Early coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) within 48 hours of admission shows no significant increase in in-hospital mortality compared to delayed CABG. This finding is crucial for patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) offers benefits for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease.
  • Optimal timing for CABG in these patients remains uncertain.
  • This study investigates early (<48h) versus delayed (>48h) CABG outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare clinical outcomes between early and delayed CABG in acute myocardial infarction patients.
  • To determine if early CABG increases in-hospital mortality risk.
  • To identify risk factors for mortality in CABG patients.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (USA).
  • Identified acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing CABG using ICD 9-DM codes.
  • Performed propensity score-matching for 24 confounders to compare early (<48h) vs. delayed (>48h) CABG groups.

Main Results:

  • Analyzed 31,969 patients; 1555 matched pairs for early vs. delayed CABG.
  • No significant difference in mortality (2% early vs. 1.8% delayed, P=0.695).
  • Comparable rates of hemorrhage, shock, and organ complications; age >70, cardiogenic shock, and mechanical support were mortality risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • CABG within 48 hours of admission is not associated with increased in-hospital mortality.
  • Early CABG is a safe option compared to delayed CABG in propensity-matched patients.
  • Age, cardiogenic shock, and mechanical support significantly impact mortality risk.
Abstract