Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Error performances of a model-based biplane fluoroscopic system for tracking knee prosthesis during treadmill gait
Arnaud Barré1,2, Kamiar Aminian3
1Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Station 9, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
This study assessed errors in biplane fluoroscopic systems for measuring knee prosthesis movement during walking. Dynamic errors were higher than static, varying by axis and prosthesis location, impacting accuracy in functional tasks.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Medical Imaging Analysis
- Orthopedic Surgery
Background:
- Roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSP) accurately measures knee prosthesis position and orientation using X-ray images.
- RSP is typically used statically, but biplane fluoroscopy can assess prosthesis kinematics during functional tasks.
- The accuracy of RSP for dynamic tasks like walking remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate static and dynamic errors of a model-based biplane fluoroscopic system during treadmill gait.
- To analyze how prosthesis speed and location relative to X-ray sources affect measurement errors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a model-based biplane fluoroscopic system to track knee joint prosthesis kinematics.
- Performed gait analysis on a treadmill to simulate functional tasks.
- Quantified static and dynamic errors (RMSE) for prosthesis position and orientation.
Main Results:
- Static maximum errors were 0.13° for orientation and 0.06 mm for position.
- Dynamic errors varied by axis and component, with the largest position error at 2.42 mm (vertical axis) and orientation error at 0.95° (medio-lateral axis).
- Errors increased with prosthesis distance from X-ray sources and with higher movement velocities.
Conclusions:
- Biplane fluoroscopy can measure dynamic knee prosthesis kinematics, but errors must be considered.
- Measurement accuracy is influenced by prosthesis location within the X-ray field and movement dynamics.
- Optimal accuracy is achieved near the system's centroid, with reduced precision near detectors.
More Related Videos
11:16Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
Published on: July 22, 2014
08:08Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
Published on: May 8, 2014