Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.1K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.1K
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

4.1K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
4.1K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Triple-tracer Functional Imaging in a Rare Case of Thyroid Paraganglioma.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same author

68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT: A "New Kid on the Block" for Evaluation of Stewart-Treves Syndrome.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same author

Dithering suppresses half-harmonic neural synchronisation to photic stimulation in humans.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

Identification of recurrent pathogenic SERPINA7 mutation causing coexistence of TBG-CD and hypothyroidism in Indian pedigrees: in Silico structural analysis of mutant TBG and literature reappraisal.

Thyroid research·2026
Same author

Disentangling decision uncertainty and motor noise in curved movement trajectories.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Triple Tracer Heterogeneity in Dual Neoplasia: The "Three Musketeers" in Discerning Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Paraganglioma in the Same Patient.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

Time-varying decision boundaries: insights from optimality analysis.

Gaurav Malhotra1, David S Leslie2, Casimir J H Ludwig3

  • 1School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. gaurav.malhotra@bristol.ac.uk.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|July 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision-making models often assume constant decision boundaries. This study introduces a new model showing optimal decision boundaries can change over time, depending on trial difficulty and uncertainty, improving decision-making theories.

Keywords:
Decision-makingDecreasing boundsOptimal decisionsReward rate

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Theory

Background:

  • The dominant decision-making model assumes static decision boundaries, influenced by accumulated evidence but not time.
  • Recent research suggests constant decision boundaries may be suboptimal in certain scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a theoretical model for identifying optimal, time-varying decision boundaries.
  • To explore conditions under which decision boundaries should adapt over time.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced a novel theoretical framework for modeling decision boundaries.
  • Analyzed how uncertainty in trial difficulty influences optimal boundary dynamics.
  • Investigated boundary behavior across different task difficulties.

Main Results:

  • Optimal decision boundaries can vary with time, driven by uncertainty about trial difficulty, not solely by deadlines or evidence costs.
  • The shape of optimal boundaries is contingent on decision task difficulty; they decrease with time for very difficult trials and increase or remain constant for easier ones.
  • The model extends to complex scenarios like unequal priors and opt-out decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Time-varying decision boundaries are often optimal and arise naturally from uncertainty over task difficulty.
  • This model offers a flexible framework for understanding dynamic decision-making processes and boundary adjustments.
  • The findings challenge traditional assumptions and provide a more nuanced view of evidence accumulation in decision-making.