Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

728
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
728
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

590
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
590
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Ending Relationships01:28

Ending Relationships

226
The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...
226

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different methods elicit different belief distributions.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Retraction Note: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Does thinking about God increase acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Evaluations are inherently comparative, but are compared to what?

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Once and Again: Repeated Viewing Affects Judgments of Spontaneity and Preparation.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable.

Nature human behaviour·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Rejecting a bad option feels like choosing a good one.

Hannah Perfecto1, Jeff Galak2, Joseph P Simmons3

  • 1Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|July 25, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Attribute matching, a novel framing effect, enhances decision-making by aligning frame and option attributes. This leads to increased confidence and consensus through greater metacognitive ease.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Framing effects influence decision-making.
  • Metacognitive ease impacts confidence and perceived consensus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and demonstrate the novel framing effect of attribute matching.
  • To investigate how attribute matching influences decision confidence and consensus.
  • To explore the mediating role of metacognitive ease and the moderating effect of attribute extremity.

Main Methods:

  • Five studies involving 4,151 participants were conducted.
  • Methods included judgment tasks (face attractiveness, word valence) and decision-making scenarios.
  • Experimental manipulations involved matching or mismatching attributes between decision frames and options.

Main Results:

  • Attribute matching significantly increased decision confidence and perceived consensus.
  • Metacognitive ease was identified as a key mediator of these effects.
  • The extremity of the matched attribute moderated the magnitude of the attribute matching effect.
  • The effect was attenuated when participants were warned about the source of ease, supporting a misattribution account.

Conclusions:

  • Attribute matching is a robust framing effect that facilitates decision-making.
  • The effect operates by increasing metacognitive ease, which in turn boosts confidence and consensus.
  • Attribute matching extends beyond valence to objective judgments, with implications for various decision contexts.