Conversion of external ventricular drainage to ventriculo-peritoneal shunt: to change or not to change the proximal

Jehuda Soleman1, Haggai Benvenisti1, Shlomi Constantini1

  • 1Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel.

Insights

Converting external ventricular drainage (EVD) to ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) in pediatric patients without replacing the catheter is safe. This procedure avoids re-operation and does not significantly increase shunt infection or malfunction rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • Hydrocephalus Management
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting

Background:

  • External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a temporary measure for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) management.
  • Conversion to a permanent ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) is often necessary.
  • Replacing the ventricular catheter during conversion can increase surgical risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of converting a tunneled EVD to a VPS without replacing the ventricular catheter in pediatric patients.
  • To determine the incidence of early shunt infection and malfunction after this conversion procedure.
  • To assess if this "no-replacement" technique impacts shunt complication rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 17 pediatric patients undergoing 18 direct EVD to VPS conversions.
  • EVDs were tunneled subcutaneously prior to conversion.
  • Primary outcome: occurrence of early (within 30 days) VPS infection or malfunction.
  • Mean follow-up: 56.8 months.

Main Results:

  • Mean EVD duration before conversion: 9.0 days.
  • Overall, 5 patients experienced shunt infections/malfunctions.
  • One patient (5.6%) had an early shunt infection (>30 days).
  • One patient had an early shunt malfunction (9 days).
  • No significant increase in early shunt infection or malfunction rates was observed.

Conclusions:

  • Direct conversion of a tunneled EVD to a VPS without catheter replacement is a safe procedure in pediatric patients.
  • This technique spares the cranial entry site, potentially reducing complications.
  • The rates of shunt infection and malfunction are not significantly increased compared to traditional methods.
Abstract