Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

1.3K
Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...
1.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

526
The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
526
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.9K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.5K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An artificial intelligence model to detect abnormal ejection fraction from non-contrast chest computed tomography: the CT-LVEF study.

European heart journal. Digital health·2026
Same author

Where Your Eyes Go: How AI Output Design Impacts Reading Behavior.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

On the Use and Application of Virtual Reality in Diagnostic Radiology.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Navigating the Blind Spots: The Critical Role of Metacognition in Diagnostic Accuracy.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Virtual Interview Etiquette for Radiology Residency: A National Survey of Program Directors.

Academic radiology·2026
Same author

Leading the Way to Wellness: The Impact of Divisional Leadership Change on Radiologist Well-Being.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

16.1K

Systemic Error in Radiology.

Stephen Waite1, Jinel Moore Scott1, Alan Legasto2

  • 11 Department of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|July 26, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Diagnostic imaging errors beyond interpretation cause patient harm. Radiologists can improve patient safety by addressing the entire imaging cycle, not just image reading.

Keywords:
appropriateness criteriaerror in radiologyimaging cyclesystemic error

More Related Videos

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

16.1K
Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Interpretive errors in diagnostic imaging are recognized causes of patient morbidity and mortality.
  • Failures within the broader medical imaging cycle, beyond image interpretation, are often underappreciated.
  • These non-interpretive errors contribute significantly to patient harm and healthcare inefficiencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe errors occurring throughout the diagnostic imaging cycle, excluding image interpretation.
  • To propose potential solutions and a framework for mitigating these non-interpretive errors.
  • To explore the evolving roles of radiologists in optimizing patient safety across the entire imaging process.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature and clinical practice to identify common failure points in the imaging cycle.
  • Analysis of error types including inappropriate study ordering, Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) failures, and communication breakdowns.
  • Development of a conceptual framework for error reduction and enhanced radiologist engagement.

Main Results:

  • Non-interpretive errors, such as inappropriate test selection and communication failures, are significant contributors to patient harm.
  • Failures in PACS and inaccurate clinician contact information lead to delayed diagnosis and care.
  • Addressing these systemic issues can reduce wasted resources and improve patient outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Comprehensive healthcare improvement requires recognizing and addressing failures throughout the entire imaging cycle, not solely interpretive errors.
  • Radiologists can enhance patient care and solidify their expertise by taking ownership of the complete imaging process.
  • Implementing solutions for non-interpretive failures is crucial for optimizing diagnostic imaging effectiveness and patient safety.