Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

09:31
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
12.5K
Differences in Trochlear Surface Damage and Wear Between Three Different Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs.
Jacob Matz1, James L Howard1, Zachary W Sisko1
1Division of Orthopedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|July 29, 2017
Summary
Modern knee replacement designs show varying wear patterns. The SIGMA design exhibited significantly increased roughness in retrieved components compared to Triathlon and GENESIS II, warranting further investigation into long-term effects.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomaterials science
- Wear analysis
Background:
- Patellofemoral kinematics are influenced by trochlear design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
- Limited data exists on comparative contact properties of contemporary TKA femoral components.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare patellofemoral joint contact properties.
- To identify surface damage and wear patterns in retrieved femoral components from three modern TKA designs.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 18 retrieved femoral components (Triathlon, SIGMA, GENESIS II) matched for key patient factors.
- Assessment of wear and surface damage via visual inspection, light microscopy, and light profilometry.
Main Results:
- All implant types showed surface damage upon visual inspection; no significant visual differences were noted.
- Light profilometry revealed significantly increased roughness in retrieved Triathlon and SIGMA components versus reference.
- SIGMA components demonstrated significantly greater roughness than Triathlon or GENESIS II, particularly in the proximal trochlear groove and medial trochlea.
Conclusions:
- Increased patellofemoral joint understanding is crucial given rising TKA demands.
- Retrieved SIGMA components exhibited higher roughness compared to Triathlon and GENESIS II.
- The causes and clinical implications of increased trochlear roughness require further research.

