Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
[Outcomes of Various Revascularisation Strategies in the Elderly STEMI Patients With Multi-Vessel Coronary Pathology]
R S Tarasov1,2, A M Kochergina1,2, V I Ganyukov1,2
1Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.
Insights
Single-stage complete revascularization using multivessel stenting (MS) is safe and effective for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients of all ages. While 30-day mortality was higher in older patients, 1-year outcomes were similar between MS and staged revascularization groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management requires timely revascularization.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a primary treatment strategy for STEMI.
- The optimal revascularization strategy, particularly multivessel stenting (MS) versus staged revascularization (SR), in elderly and middle-aged STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (pPCI) remains an area of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of single-stage complete revascularization via multivessel stenting (MS) as primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
- To compare outcomes between MS and staged revascularization (SR) strategies in elderly (≥65 years) and middle-aged (<64 years) STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 327 STEMI patients undergoing pPCI between 2009 and 2013.
- Patients were categorized into elderly (≥65 years, n=103) and middle-aged (<64 years, n=224) groups.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes, including mortality, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization at 12-month follow-up, between MS and SR subgroups within each age category.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in baseline characteristics between MS and SR subgroups within age groups.
- Multivessel stenting (MS) was found to be safe and effective across both age groups.
- While 30-day mortality was higher in the elderly group (≥65 years), 1-year outcomes (mortality, MI, TVR) showed no significant differences between MS and SR strategies within either the elderly or middle-aged cohorts.
Conclusions:
- Single-stage complete revascularization with multivessel stenting (MS) is a safe and effective strategy for STEMI patients, regardless of age.
- The choice between MS and staged revascularization (SR) does not significantly impact 1-year clinical outcomes in STEMI patients when performed as primary PCI.
- Elderly STEMI patients may experience higher short-term mortality, but long-term results are comparable between revascularization strategies.
Aim:
to assess safety and efficacy of single stage complete revascularization by multivessel stenting as primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in elderly and middle aged patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Material And Methods:
We included in this analysis data on 327 of 1690 STEMI patients who had undergone pPCI from 2009 to 2013. Age of 103 patients was more or equal 65 and of 224 less or equal 64 years. Multivessel stenting (MS) during pPCI was carried out in 26 and 65, while strategy of staged revascularization (SR) was implemented in 77 and 129 individuals among older and younger patients, respectively. During follow-up for 12 months we registered deaths, myocardial infarctions, and unplanned target vessel revascularizations.
Results:
In each age group ( more or equal 65 and less or equal 64 years) there were no significant differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between subgroups of patients subjected to MS and SR. MS appeared to be safe and effective irrespective of age. Mortality during first 30-days was higher among patients aged more or equal 65 years. However, within each age group there were no significant differences in 1 year results between MS and SR subgroups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management

