Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

07:13
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
11.5K
A sliding two-alternative forced-choice paradigm for pitch discrimination
Dorothée Arzounian1, Mathilde de Kerangal2, Alain de Cheveigné1
1Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, 29 rue d'Ulm, F-75230 Paris, France.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 3, 2017
Summary
A new "sliding two-alternative forced choice" (2AFC) task for frequency discrimination showed comparable results to the classic 2AFC task. This sliding 2AFC task offers potential benefits for research efficiency and studying context effects.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Perception
- Psychoacoustics
- Human Factors
Background:
- Frequency discrimination is crucial for auditory perception.
- Traditional methods often use limited tones per trial, potentially limiting data yield and historical context.
- A novel 'sliding two-alternative forced choice' (2AFC) task was proposed to address these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of a new sliding 2AFC task for frequency discrimination.
- To compare the sliding 2AFC task with a classic 2-tone-per-trial 2AFC task.
- To evaluate the impact of stimulus parameters on performance in both tasks.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed frequency discrimination using both a sliding 2AFC task and a classic 2-tone-per-trial 2AFC task.
- Stimulus parameters, including frequency step size and standard tone, were varied across conditions.
- Performance was measured by comparing thresholds between tasks and conditions.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in thresholds were found between the sliding 2AFC and classic 2AFC tasks when using similar parameters.
- The sliding 2AFC task showed performance decrements with large frequency steps.
- The classic 2AFC task demonstrated an advantage with a fixed frequency standard.
- Variability in results was similar for both tasks.
Conclusions:
- The sliding 2AFC task is a viable alternative to the classic 2-tone-per-trial 2AFC task for frequency discrimination.
- The new task offers potential advantages in terms of response yield and uniform stimulation history.
- Careful consideration of stimulus parameters is necessary for optimal performance with the sliding 2AFC task.

