Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sibilant differentiation before and after tongue cancer surgery: Acoustics, kinematics and the role of sensorimotor controla).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

An interpretable approach to detect case law on housing and eviction issues within the HUDOC database.

Artificial intelligence and law·2026
Same author

Improvement of speech perception following articulatory-target based production training for second language acquisition.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Prevalence of internalizing disorders, symptoms, and traits across age using advanced nonlinear models - ERRATUM.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Kinematic and Acoustic Responses to Predictable and Unexpected Auditory Feedback Perturbations in Speakers With and Without Parkinson's Disease.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Separable processes for live "in-person" and live "zoom-like" faces.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

929

Quantitative identification of dialect-specific articulatory settings.

Martijn Wieling1, Mark Tiede2

  • 1University of Groningen, Oude Kijk in 't Jatstraat 26, 9712 EK Groningen, The Netherlands.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study quantitatively compared articulatory settings in two Dutch dialects. Speakers from Southeast Netherlands showed significantly more frontal tongue positions than those from the North, revealing dialect-level articulatory differences.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

36.1K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

929
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

36.1K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Phonetics
  • Sociolinguistics

Background:

  • Dialectal variations in pronunciation are well-documented.
  • Quantitative data on articulatory settings differences between Dutch dialects is limited.
  • Understanding articulatory settings can illuminate speech production mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively contrast the articulatory settings of two Dutch dialects.
  • To identify specific differences in tongue positioning between dialect speakers.
  • To provide empirical evidence for dialectal variations in speech articulation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized portable electromagnetic articulography (EMA) to collect tongue movement data.
  • Recorded speech data from 34 speakers across two high schools in the Netherlands.
  • Analyzed tongue positions during speech pauses to compare articulatory settings.

Main Results:

  • Identified a significant difference in articulatory settings between the two Dutch dialect groups.
  • Speakers from Ubbergen (Southeast Netherlands) exhibited more frontal tongue positions compared to Ter Apel (North Netherlands).
  • Quantitative evidence confirmed dialect-specific variations in tongue placement during speech.

Conclusions:

  • Articulatory settings differ significantly at the Dutch dialect level.
  • Frontal tongue positioning is a distinguishing feature of the Ubbergen dialect compared to the Ter Apel dialect.
  • This study provides a quantitative basis for understanding dialectal phonetics in Dutch speech.