COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BONE HEALING FOLLOWING BONE CUTS USING SURGICAL BURS AND MICROSAWS

Bone cuts on the tibia of 6 healthy dogs were studied using surgical burs and microsaws arranged in two groups by random selection to assess the speed of cutting, precision and bone healing. Bone cuts in Group A were made with surgical burs of 1.6 mm diameter using micromotor at 40,000 revolutions per minute (RPM) whereas in Group B they were created using Stryker microsaws of 0.75 mm width at the speed of 40,000 RPM. In each group, the dogs were sacrificed at the end of 8, 12 and 16 weeks and a section of the tibia containing the fracture site was removed to assess healing histopathologically. Based on clinical, radiological and histopathological examination, the results of this study indicate that microsaws have their best use in osteotomy procedures in terms of precision and thermal injury to bone whereas ostectomy procedures are more convenient with surgical burs.