[Cavernomas of the central nervous system : Observational study of 111 patients]

The prevalence of cavernomas (cavernous hemangioma) is 0.1-0.7%. Cavernomas are often found as an incidental finding within the framework of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in mainly young and healthy patients. In the literature, the reported risk of hemorrhage varies greatly and is sometimes higher than that of aneurysms, which is surprising given that cavernomas are part of the low blood pressure system. After the diagnosis the medical practitioner and the patient have to decide on the further therapy, either surgical removal or the strategy of watchful waiting (conservative treatment). The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of bleeding of cavernomas and the consequences and to determine the satisfaction of patients with treatment. All these aspects should make the therapeutic decision easier for medical practitioners.

The study included all patients who were treated in the military hospital in Ulm during the period 2002-2012 and with the diagnosis of one or more cavernomas of the central nervous system (CNS) detected by MRI. This resulted in a total number of 111 patients. We recorded the epidemiological data and analyzed all cavernomas with respect to the location, size, treatment, side effects, etc. Furthermore, all included patients were sent a comprehensive questionnaire about symptoms, course of the disease and the quality of life. The response rate was 38%. All the collected data were analyzed with respect to the various aspects.

Depending on the definition of a bleeding event of a cavernoma and selection of the observational period, the probability of a hemorrhage risk ranged from 1.3% to 5.9% per patient year. This relatively high proportion is, however, put into perspective by the mostly mild consequences of a bleeding event. Many cavernomas, which were detected as an incidental finding showed signs of previous bleeding but the patients remained free of symptoms. Additionally, there was no patient in this collective who suffered serious consequences due to a bleeding event. Of the patients with temporal cavernomas 45% had symptomatic epilepsy. The results of the patient survey were heterogeneous. Some patients stated that in retrospect they would not choose surgical treatment again.

As a result of our findings we think it is important to critically look at the indications for surgical removal of cavernomas and special attention must be paid to informed consent of the patient. The frequent appearance of temporal cavernomas and their propensity to epileptic seizures is an essential aspect, which certainly influences the therapeutic decision. Although cavernomas are a venous malformation in the low blood pressure system, the determined frequency of hemorrhage was 5.9%, which was higher than expected but which is confirmed by other studies. Reports on severe sequelae of cavernoma bleeding are also rare in the literature, which relativizes the resulting danger of the relatively high probability of hemorrhage.