Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

08:55
Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion
Published on: February 5, 2020
8.0K
Mobility Device Quality Affects Participation Outcomes for People With Disabilities: A Structural Equation Modeling
Susan Magasi1, Alex Wong2, Ana Miskovic3
1Departments of Occupational Therapist and Disability Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|August 9, 2017
Summary
Mobility device quality significantly impacts participation for adults with spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and stroke. Ensuring reliable, maintainable devices is crucial for community participation.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Science
- Assistive Technology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Community-dwelling adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and stroke often rely on mobility devices.
- Participation outcomes are influenced by various factors, including the quality of assistive devices.
- Understanding the relationship between device quality and participation is essential for improving quality of life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of mobility device quality indicators on participation outcomes.
- To examine the moderating role of device quality in community-dwelling adults with SCI, TBI, and stroke.
- To identify specific device quality attributes that influence participation.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional survey study utilizing structural equation modeling.
- Data collected from 250 community-dwelling adults with SCI, TBI, and stroke.
- Assessed device quality (repairability, reliability, ease of maintenance), device type, and participation outcomes using validated scales.
Main Results:
- Indicators of mobility device quality significantly moderated participation outcomes.
- Repairability, ease of maintenance, and device reliability accounted for 20% of the variance in participation.
- Wheelchair users reported lower participation enfranchisement compared to ambulation aid users.
Conclusions:
- Mobility device quality is a critical determinant of participation outcomes.
- Access to reliable and maintainable mobility devices is essential for community participation.
- Future interventions should focus on improving the quality and accessibility of assistive devices.
Keywords:
Brain injuries, traumaticOutcome and process assessment (health care)RehabilitationSocial participationSpinal cord injuriesStrokeWalkersWheelchairs
