Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

331
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
331
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings01:29

Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings

211
Other adult family members and siblings play a crucial role in shaping children’s social and emotional development. While parents or primary caregivers are often the central figures in early attachment and socialization, other adults in a child’s life, such as grandparents, aunts, and uncles, can significantly influence developmental outcomes. These influences depend on each adult’s personality and may help compensate when a primary caregiver is emotionally distant or...
211
Altruism01:03

Altruism

47.8K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
47.8K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

43.7K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.7K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

265
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
265
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

292
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
292

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children's Third-Party Punishment Reveals a Genuine Concern for Fairness and Justice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

The Impact of Intergroup Collaboration on In-Group Bias Between Rohingya Refugee and Bangladeshi Host Community Children.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Children consider what others did not know as well as what they could not do when judging their actions.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same author

Two modes of equality matching: positive and negative direct reciprocity.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Awareness shapes fairness: how Children's emotion atributions reflect sensitivity to unequal treatment.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Trusting Wisely? Developmental Changes in How Children Learn and Adapt to Partner Trustworthiness.

Developmental science·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Children's collaboration induces fairness rather than generosity.

John Corbit1, Katherine McAuliffe2, Tara C Callaghan3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Cognition
|August 12, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collaboration encourages children to be more equitable, not just more prosocial. After working together, older children in both India and Canada showed a greater willingness to sacrifice advantages to achieve fairness, supporting the Equity Hypothesis.

Keywords:
CollaborationCooperationEquityFairnessGenerosityProsociality

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Neuroscience

Background:

  • Children exhibit disadvantageous inequity aversion (DI), rejecting unfair allocations that disadvantage them.
  • Some older children also display advantageous inequity aversion (AI), rejecting unfair allocations that advantage them.
  • Previous research suggests collaboration increases sharing, but the underlying mechanism (generosity vs. equity) remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether collaboration enhances prosociality (Generosity Hypothesis) or strengthens equitable tendencies (Equity Hypothesis) in children's resource allocation.
  • To examine developmental and cultural variations in inequity aversion following collaborative versus parallel work.

Main Methods:

  • Tested 7-13-year-old children in rural India and 4-10-year-old children in rural Canada.
  • Children worked in pairs either collaboratively or in parallel to obtain candy.
  • Assessed disadvantageous inequity aversion (DI) and advantageous inequity aversion (AI) using specific measures to differentiate between hypotheses.

Main Results:

  • Collaboration did not increase acceptance of disadvantageous inequity (DI) offers in either cultural group, refuting the Generosity Hypothesis.
  • Older children in both India and Canada demonstrated advantageous inequity aversion (AI) after collaboration, but not after parallel work.
  • Advantageous inequity aversion (AI) emerged in younger age groups in India and was observed in early middle childhood in Canada post-collaboration.

Conclusions:

  • Collaboration does not primarily foster general prosociality but rather enhances a commitment to equity.
  • The findings support the Equity Hypothesis, indicating that collaborative experiences can induce a willingness to forgo personal advantage for fairness.
  • Collaboration appears to be a critical factor in the development and emergence of advantageous inequity aversion (AI) across different cultural contexts.