Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Flash-and-Freeze: A Novel Technique to Capture Membrane Dynamics with Electron Microscopy
Published on: May 1, 2017
On the time required to freeze water
J R Espinosa1, C Navarro1, E Sanz1
1Departamento de Quimica Fisica, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain and Departamento de Fisica Aplicada I , Facultad de Ciencias Fisicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
This study estimates ice nucleation and growth rates for TIP4P/ICE and mW water models. The TIP4P/ICE model shows faster ice growth, impacting crystallization times and potentially explaining experimental discrepancies.
Area of Science:
- Physical Chemistry
- Computational Materials Science
- Thermodynamics
Background:
- Accurate simulation of ice nucleation and growth is crucial for understanding phase transitions.
- Previous studies on TIP4P/ICE and mW water models showed differences in freezing dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate ice nucleation and growth rates for TIP4P/ICE and mW water models using the seeding technique.
- To compare simulation results with experimental data and explain discrepancies.
- To investigate the crossover from nucleation-controlled to growth-controlled crystallization.
Main Methods:
- Seeding technique for estimating nucleation rates.
- Determination of ice growth rates for TIP4P/ICE and mW models.
- Application of Avrami's expression to estimate crystallization times.
- Analysis of compressibility and relaxation times in supercooled water.
Main Results:
- TIP4P/ICE and mW models exhibit significantly different ice freezing dynamics, with mW having a lower nucleation rate and much faster growth rate.
- Experimental nucleation rates fall between TIP4P/ICE and mW predictions, closer to TIP4P/ICE.
- Minimum crystallization times differ by orders of magnitude, with TIP4P/ICE's value aligning with conditions for glass formation.
Conclusions:
- The seeding technique provides valuable insights into ice formation dynamics, bridging simulation and experiment.
- Differences in interfacial free energy and growth dynamics explain the distinct behaviors of TIP4P/ICE and mW.
- The crossover phenomenon and compressibility maximum in supercooled water offer explanations for experimental variations and model characteristics.
Related Concept Videos
Freezing Point Depression and Boiling Point Elevation
The boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which its vapor pressure is equal to ambient atmospheric pressure. Since the vapor pressure of a solution is lowered due to the presence of nonvolatile solutes, it stands to reason that the solution’s boiling point will subsequently be increased. Vapor pressure increases with temperature, and so a solution will require a higher temperature than will pure solvent to achieve any given vapor pressure, including one...
Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing
States of Water
Water freezes when the intermolecular forces are greater than the kinetic energy. Unlike most other substances, water is less dense in its solid state than in its liquid state. This is because each water molecule can form...
Frost Resistant Concrete
Introducing microscopic air bubbles into the concrete mix through air entrainment creates small voids that accommodate ice expansion, thereby reducing internal pressures and preventing cracking. The optimal amount of...

