Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software
Published on: August 31, 2018
So You Want To Be A Reviewer
H Bruce Vogt1, Victor C Huber2, Keith A Hansen3,4
1Department of Family Medicine, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine.
Abstract:
Peer review is a process for evaluating the quality of "work" of a scientist or professional as judged by others in the same or related field. In the context of the biomedical and health sciences, it primarily pertains to review of manuscripts submitted to journals for consideration of publication, abstracts for proposed presentations at professional meetings, and competitive research grant applications. Serving as a reviewer is a scholarly pursuit and a worthwhile endeavor, assuming it is approached in a conscientious, responsible manner. The purpose of this article is to define peer review and its various forms, suggest reasons for serving as a manuscript reviewer, discuss considerations prior to accepting a review assignment, and provide guidelines for the process.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Quality Assurance
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Proofreading

