Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early Salivary Gland Shrinkage Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Acute Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Optimal radiotherapy dose scheduling with variable fraction sizes and breaks via sequential mixed-integer convex programming.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Adaptive and sequential cancer therapies emerge from treatment schedule optimization.

Research square·2026
Same author

The association between sepsis and diagnostic errors: A secondary analysis of the Utility of Predictive Systems for Diagnostic Error study.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same author

A multi-institutional EPID-based 3D dose reconstruction model in a virtual phantom for standardized patient QA, benchmarking and auditing for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

A Call for a Collaborative Framework for Automation in Adaptive Radiotherapy.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K

IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi-institutional validation.

Gilmer Valdes1,2, Maria F Chan3, Seng Boh Lim3

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|August 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validates a machine learning approach for Virtual Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Quality Assurance (QA), accurately predicting gamma passing rates across different institutions and measurement methods.

Keywords:
IMRT QAmachine learningpoisson regressionradiotherapy

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.6K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.6K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Machine Learning Applications

Background:

  • Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) requires rigorous Quality Assurance (QA) to ensure treatment accuracy.
  • Current IMRT QA methods can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.
  • Virtual QA approaches offer a potential solution for efficient and accurate IMRT verification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate a machine learning (ML) based Virtual IMRT QA framework.
  • To assess the framework's accuracy in predicting gamma passing rates.
  • To evaluate performance across different measurement techniques and institutions.

Main Methods:

  • A previously developed ML algorithm was tested on independent IMRT measurements from two institutions.
  • Institution 1 used diode-array detectors; Institution 2 used portal dosimetry.
  • A weighted Poisson regression with Lasso regularization predicted passing rates using 90 plan complexity metrics.

Main Results:

  • The ML model predicted gamma passing rates within 3% accuracy at Institution 1.
  • Accuracy was within 3.5% for 120/139 plans at Institution 2 using portal dosimetry.
  • Key predictive features included irradiated area, jaw position, and MLC leaf gaps.

Conclusions:

  • Virtual IMRT QA successfully predicts passing rates across different measurement techniques and institutions.
  • This ML-driven approach has significant potential to enhance current IMRT QA processes.
  • Accurate prediction of QA passing rates can streamline IMRT workflow and improve safety.