Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Giving what one should: explanations for the knowledge-behavior gap for altruistic giving
1Boston University, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Insights
Children often fail to share resources as they believe they should, a phenomenon known as the knowledge-behavior gap. Research suggests self-regulation, social distance, and social learning are key to helping children bridge this gap as they mature.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Moral Development
Background:
- Children often exhibit a knowledge-behavior gap, particularly in sharing resources.
- Dictator Game studies reveal young children frequently keep resources instead of sharing half as they believe they should.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence for explanations of the knowledge-behavior gap in children.
- To identify mechanisms that help children close this gap with age.
Main Methods:
- Review of over a dozen recent Dictator Game studies.
- Analysis of evidence for five potential explanations: self-regulation, social distance, theory of mind, moral knowledge, and social learning.
Main Results:
- Children's belief about sharing often does not align with their actual behavior.
- Five factors are explored as potential explanations for this discrepancy.
Conclusions:
- Self-regulation, social distance, and social learning provide the most promising explanations for how children bridge the knowledge-behavior gap.
- Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for addressing disparities in prosocial behavior development.
Abstract:
Several studies have shown that children struggle to give what they believe that they should: the so-called knowledge-behavior gap. Over a dozen recent Dictator Game studies find that, although young children believe that they should give half of a set of resources to a peer, they typically give less and often keep all of the resources for themselves. This article reviews recent evidence for five potential explanations for the gap and how children close it with age: self-regulation, social distance, theory of mind, moral knowledge and social learning. I conclude that self-regulation, social distance, and social learning show the most promising evidence for understanding the mechanisms that can close the gap.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Egoism and Altruism
Altruism
Fundamental Attribution Error
Attribution Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory