Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?
Roland Linder1, J Zeidler2, F Verheyen3
1Wissenschaftliches Institut der Techniker Krankenkasse (WINEG), Bramfelder Straße 140, 22305, Hamburg, Germany. prof.dr.roland.linder@wineg.de.
Insights
National guidelines recommend bypass surgery for three-vessel coronary heart disease (CHD). This study found no significant difference in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use, suggesting treatment may not always follow guidelines. Interdisciplinary discussion is advised.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- National guidelines recommend coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for three-vessel coronary heart disease (CHD).
- Concerns exist regarding adherence to these guidelines in clinical practice for three-vessel CHD.
- Understanding treatment patterns and factors influencing revascularization decisions is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess adherence to national guidelines for treating patients with one-, two-, and three-vessel coronary heart disease (CHD).
- To investigate the impact of patient demographics (age, sex) and comorbidities on revascularization strategy selection.
- To evaluate the utilization of PCI versus CABG in different CHD severity groups.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of claims data from nearly 10 million patients insured by Techniker Krankenkasse, a major German statutory health insurance fund.
- Comparison of revascularization rates (PCI vs. CABG) across patient groups with one-, two-, and three-vessel CHD.
- Statistical analysis to determine the influence of age, sex, and comorbidity on treatment choices.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the rate of PCI was observed between patients with one-, two-, or three-vessel CHD.
- The study could not disprove the hypothesis that patients with three-vessel CHD are not consistently treated according to national guideline recommendations.
- Patient age, sex, and comorbidity did not significantly alter the observed revascularization patterns in a way that explained guideline deviation.
Conclusions:
- Current treatment practices for three-vessel coronary heart disease (CHD) may not fully align with national guideline recommendations.
- The study highlights a potential gap between evidence-based guidelines and actual clinical application for revascularization strategies.
- Optimal treatment decisions for two- and three-vessel CHD necessitate interdisciplinary collaboration between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.
Abstract:
The national guidelines for treatment of chronic coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend surgical coronary aortic bypass grafting (CABG) rather than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with a coronary three-vessel disease. The epidemiology of three-vessel CHD and data about the application of different revascularisation strategies raise suspicion of deviation from the guidelines in the treatment of those patients. Claims data containing records of almost 10 million patients of the largest German statutory health insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse) were utilised to measure adherence to the guidelines for treatment of groups of patients with one-, two-, and three-vessel CHD, respectively. The impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on each patient's revascularisation procedure was investigated as well. There was no significant difference in the rate of PCI between the groups. In conclusion, the hypothesis that patients with a coronary three-vessel disease are not always treated according to the recommendations of the national guidelines could not be disproved by this study. Finally, the results of this study suggest that the best revascularisation strategy for each patient with two- and three-vessel disease should be decided upon by an interdisciplinary discussion between both cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

